Sunday 23 April 2017

I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change, Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday April 22nd 2017

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change", Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday April 22nd 2017

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change", with book and lyrics by Joe Dipietro and music by Jimmy Roberts was presented by the Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, on Saturday April 22nd 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

Immediately arriving home I wrote the following paragraph onto my Facebook page:

"The Griffith University/Queensland Conservatorium production of "I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change" played a short three night season at Chapel Off Chapel.  They are going to play in Sydney at the Lend Lease Darling Quarter Theatre 1-25 Harbour St Sydney from April 27-29th 2017.  They did a fine job, with what is usually played as a four-hander, with a cast of 27.  The harmony singing was terrific and there were some very talented young performers. They changed some of the songs for a larger ensemble that gives more depth to the music.   Some of the comedy timing works better than other scenes.  They played the poignant scenes with honesty. I laughed a lot tonight and thoroughly enjoyed the show."

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change" was presented by Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, at  Chapel Off Chapel for a short three day season and we saw it on Saturday April 22nd 2017

Some scenes worked better than others, though the singing was generally very good.  The diction with singing was clearer than some of the speaking.  There were rich harmonies and this is where the cast shone with the large ensemble numbers.

Yes, some segues between scenes could do with tightening up.  But, hey this is a student production of the highest quality.

Acting wise some of the cast maintained their character with more conviction than others.  The best actors were those who clearly defined their character, even when a background player.  It was terrific to see the roles shared among the whole cast.  I now prefer this version with a larger cast as it showed us more versions of regular people in these situations, and struck a nerve-of-recognition by the audience's laughter and engagement.

The small orchestra of five played the score well and were not distracting as they were upstage centre during the entire show.  Three of the orchestra were in the main cast and showed their versatility for future employers.

This musical was well cast with the student cast as they played a variety of roles and ages.  This young cast brought Joe Dipietro's book and lyrics, and  Jimmy Roberts' music to life.  No wonder this show ran for nearly twelve years Off-Broadway with such a tight book and such hummable tunes.

Lighting Design by Tom Dodds was basic and adequate.  The simplicity of the design was its success with no flashy tricks, but rather designs that kept our focus on the required action.

The programme clearly outlined the musical numbers and scenes with the corresponding cast list that aids in my memory of the show.  I hope that more production companies follow their example.

Chapel Off Chapel has renovated the bar and toilets that gives the venue a much more appealing supporting role.

During Act Two, there was a mobile phone incident that the entire theatre could see.  In the second row aisle seat, a woman just had to check her messages during a song.  She held her phone up high enough so that the back row could not miss her rudeness.  It was so distracting as the front row seats were vacant for any late comers.  Her prominent holding of her phone so high even took the cast aback by her rudeness.

The opening set the scene for what we were to expect.

I do not remember "We Had It All" in the 1999 version that I saw at the Athenaeum Theatre.  The "Not tonight I'm busy" scene was played well by Zoe Harlen and Oliver Lacey as they replayed variations of the scene over time.  They set the mood and the standards for many of the scenes to follow.

"A Stud and a Babe" showed us how both Jessica Mahony and Grady Swithenbank can transition between nerdy characters to more confident characters.  His costume was decidedly gaudy in keeping with the lyrics of the song.

The men sung "Why? Cause I'm a Guy" with gusto and verve.  They showed their commitment to the choreography with their defined characters' poses and mannerisms.  The ladies had masking concerns due to the small stage.

"Tear Jerk" showed us the change in Casey Martin's character with humour while he watched an unwanted "chick flick" as Shubshri Kandiah graciously and steadfastly held her characterisation.  The ensemble on stage left was in semi darkness with a simple and effective lighting plot by Tom Dodds, reminiscent of the cinema scene from "Equus".

"The Lasagna Incident" was well staged with Jordan Malone restraining her sexual tension, while we questioned Philip Jones' character's sexual preference or his virginal naivety.

"And Now the Parents" was one of the funniest scenes due to the defined characterisations of the parents ably played by Olivia Fisher and Josh Whitten.  The choreography by Helena Moore was crisp and clean with six framed observers seated watching the antics as if a Greek chorus.  They reminded me of the paintings on the wall from Harry Potter's Hogwart's school halls observing the action.  Austin David Cornish and Georgia Spark played the prospective couple and allowed the parents to shine during "Hey There, Single Gal/Guy".  Some women in the seated ensemble were not as clean with their head movements as others.  The crispness and sharpness added to the humour, especially with the more expressive faces.

"Satisfaction Guaranteed" was a funny scene especially with the entrance of the two men wearing lampshades on their heads.  With no wing space they entered via the tunnel on the audience left. It would have been funnier with a cleaner entrance from the wings of a theatre, and these young performers navigated the space with some hesitation, but I admired their determination.  Of all scenes, this looked like a drama school exercise.

"He Called Me" was a terrific scene especially for the journey of Shelise Vandal's character.  She showed us how we can get caught in unwanted phone-calls with honesty, and juxtaposed this with the change in her surprise in the second phone-call.  The choreography could have been executed a bit more accurately with the use of the pizza boxes.

"Scared Straight" was my favourite scene with the exactitude of intention from all four main players.  The entrance of Elliot Baker will not be quickly forgotten.  He has a rich tone to his voice and reminds me of Rowan Atkinson.   The young couple Sammy Sand and Jenna Dearness-Dark showed us how quickly they could be convinced to be united by the measured manipulation of Elliot Baker and Georgia Bolton.

The "Wedding Vows" scene was well staged for a large cast on such a small stage.   Some of the supporting cast defined and maintained their character more clearly than others.  The kiss sealed the end of Act One.

Act Two began cleanly with the end of Act One kiss.  This was where the basic lighting was at its best showing the couple in silhouette to begin the act.

Act Two shows the various characters aging with children, sexual deprivation, relationship complacency and funerals.  The characters age well and are well cast.

"Always A Bridesmaid" was a song made in heaven for the statuesque Hannah Gwatkin.  She would make a wonderful Ado Annie from "Oklahoma".  The version of this song with two other females (Maddison McDonald and Zoe Harlan) and the lone male, Casey Martin was poignant and touching to reveal, that men too, can play second fiddle to a bride or groom.  The harmonies were rich and emphasised the pathos of the scene.  Here the costumes worked well to highlight the ridiculous amounts spent on weddings.

"Whatever Happened to Baby's Parents" and "The Baby Song", could have been hammed up, but not so, as this scene, was in the capable hands of this fine trio.  They drew blood with the laughs they received from an audience who cringed in recognising common behaviours in this scene.  Joshua Moore's humiliation of baby talk was haunting.  The simple props aided the scene.

The "Waiting"  sequence and the "Waiting Trio" song was better than the four characters version. The 32 seconds of the football game drew lots of laughs of recognition from the audience, as Georgia Bolton was not to be disturbed by Shrubshri Kandiah.  The queuing for the ladies toilets was visually more realistic and desperate with five ladies. Manda Flannery had us convinced that she needed to pee.  Josh Whitten was brilliant in his shopping porter sequence and the audience roared laughter with recognition at his character's plight.  He is a real talent to watch and would be terrific as Nicely Nicely Johnson from "Guys and Dolls".  This sequence reminded me of the split-action during Sydney Theatre Company's version of "Falsettos".

"The Family That Drives Together" and the song "On the Highway of Love" was my favourite scene for the clarity of defined characters by all five performers. The timing of the comedy worked beautifully with the sly nuanced idiosyncrasies of each character.  Oliver Lacey as the dad who finally had control behind the wheel of his car revealed his macho ego, as the mother was played with requisite nervous tension by Courtney Monsma.  The baby with dummy was played by Olivia Fisher, which was a great piece of casting, as she surprised us by her sudden change in age as the mother from "And Now the Parents".  The two older sisters were played with conviction by Jessica Mahony and Jordan Malone.

"Shouldn't I Be Less in Love With You" highlighted the stillness of Meg Hamilton's aura as she quietly read the supplement from the newspaper, while her husband, Elliot Baker lamented his complacent love for her.  The scene was more poignant for her measured underplaying and comfort in her own surroundings.  Both played a middle aged couple with honesty.

"The Very First Dating Video of Rose Ritz" had Lauren Ware doing a sterling job in this self revelation that grows into a confessional scene of assurance and self satisfaction to be comfortable in her own skin.  This is a scene of resolve and the final lines are telling as she does not want to change a thing, which is in stark contrast to the title of this musical.

"Funerals Are for Dating" and "I Can Live With That" was poignantly played by Georgia Spark and Caleb Robinson-Cook who played the older couple with conviction and sincerity.  It is a very quiet and reflective sequence and brings the musical into clear focus of our humanity.

The finale, the "Epilogue" and "I Love You, You're Perfect Now Change" was stirring musically with the resounding and sensational harmonies of the ensemble.  The staging was brilliant to pair or group the performers as we were reminded of each character's journey.  I was glad for a reprise, but I wanted this whole sequence repeated.  I think by the audience's applause they wanted "Epilogue" and "I Love You, You're Perfect Now Change" completely repeated.

Sue Rider, the director should be very proud of this fine group of young performers.  Musical Director, Heidi Loveland should also be proud of the fine ensemble.

Overall, this production obtained an 8/10 from me, while my partner gave it an 8.5/10.


Monday 17 April 2017

Lord of the Flies, Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017

Lord of the Flies, Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017




"Lord of the Flies" from the novel by William Golding has been adapted by Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, and was presented at the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Lord of the Flies" is co-directed by Matthew Bourne and Scott Ambler, while  "Lord of the Flies" is choreographed by Scott Ambler, who uses a variety of styles of movement to encompass so many emotions and atmospheres. Scott Ambler has created iconic moments from the book and translated them to the stage with clarity and finesse.  His movement vocabulary expands from the archetypal to more specific.

The set and costumes are designed by Lez Brotherston who has succeeded on many fronts with the versatility of the available props and staging levels.  The set is a stage of a deserted theatre.  The boys begin in crisp school uniforms and gradually these change due to the circumstances.  The costumes on the racks should have been covered to be kept so clean, or, they should have been dusty to heighten the realism of a deserted theatre.  This took away an edge of the drama.

The transposition from an island to a disused theatre works and the set reminded me of the 2011 revival of "Follies".  This work would be so much more haunting in a venue similar to the old HSV Tele-theatre where "The Rocky Horror Show" played in Melbourne in 1975.

Scott Ambler's  choreography has succeeded on many fronts, beginning with the precision of the boys marching during their opening entrance.  The boys are in years and size order as they create a distinct school grading hierarchy.  They vary the formations to highlight their discipline and ability to follow instructions.    This is ominous as we readers know what is to come.  The subsequent formations and patterns highlight the passing down of traditions via a system within well drilled disciplined school.  What were the young boys to become in their formative years was shown by the older boys.  There is so much depth in the simplicity of the patterns: as we are watching their fate within this opening: to become like the older boys. All of the the young dancers were accurate and precise in their movements and would make the production team very proud indeed.

My heart leaped a beat of joy, as many of these young boys and men are having opportunities that will influence them for the rest of their lives.

Gradually the boys relax and become playful as they discover the insides of the derelict theatre.  This is where the choreography and staging becomes more complex.  Each boy has a distinct personality and they are responsible to tell their character's individual story.  The action is more staging rather than dance choreography and each boy has their moment to shine.  The staging is complex and integrates lots of small groups and duets and cameo solos to allow us to get to know the different characters.  Each boy has a unique way of moving for their character, some more defined than others.

There are some clever and theatrical uses of the 44 gallon drums to create cars and tanks that paid homage to the pedal car from "The Flintstones".  

A duet of gymnastic boys hung and swung on the poles supporting the main structure, with great precision and lovely lines.

A drumstick is discovered and replaces the conch from the novel.  The staging and choreography of the drumstick sequence is so clear emphasising the rules of listening to who holds the drumstick and the democratic process used by the school boys.

As the day becomes darker, mobile phones are taken out and used as torches to discover the theatre.  A search party is sent out to find food and water. This group goes into the audience.  They return with boxes of potato chips, sweets and water.  Wearing hoodies is reference to modern culture that challenges our traditional image of hooded youth from hoodlums to survivors or food saviours.

Simon (Patrick Weir) helps supervise setting up shelters and also is aware of protecting the younger and more vulnerable boys.  There is so much depth in these scenes that I cannot keep up with each of the characters.  I try to go with the flow.  I want to absorb so much of this production.

Gradually the boys turn to discovering, playing, and play-fighting until disorder eventually ensues. 

There is the famous pig hunting scene when the pig is beheaded and put onto a stake as a badge of honour.  There is short sequence that reminded me of Ravel's music and Maurice Bejart's ballet "Bolero".  This creates such a powerful image that is more disturbing due to their youth.  

The fire smoke signal scene is used to also keep the boys warm.

There is the power struggle between Ralph (Dominic North) and Jack (Daniel Wright) with a duet power struggle/fight sequence. Both men dance with conviction and unrelenting intensity.  Jack (Daniel Wright) develops from a confident strong man to a savage.

Piggy (Luke Murphy) assures Ralph (Dominic North) and supports him of his leadership role.  They join allegiance in fear of what Jack might become.  They use the clothes racks as shelter and protection and cover from Jack's gang.

Jack (Daniel Wright) breaks Piggy's glasses.  Piggy (Luke Murphy) goes searching for his glasses in a moving solo of pain and vulnerability.

A ghost or a stranger appears from the orchestra pit and I think this represented the corpse of the fighter pilot .    The young boy Percy (William Gilchrist) with his teddy bear sees the dead body and is frightened and seeks cover.

The dance becomes a ritual, that is tribal and primitive, and reminds me of the savages dances in old movies including "King Kong".

There is a menacing and maniacal chase scene of savagery, up and over and under the tiered set of scaffolding.  This chase is both dangerous due to the multi tiered set and the speed of the choreography.  The whole cast danced this sequence with requisite desperation and intent.

A young man on stage right unravels a tethered rope, and appears to lower a moon.  The various pigs dance a haunting pas de quatre in front of the moon to create striking silhouettes.   Simon (Patrick Weir) dances with four pig characters in a haunting nightmare.  Sadly, when pulling the rope back to raise the moon, the co-ordination alerted me that someone else must have been lowering and raising this large set piece in the wings. The entry of the moon entranced me by the magic of theatre, while the raising of the moon lost me by mistimed execution.

Some of the facial expressions and body language are priceless, while other expressions are forced and lacked a real connection to the emotional thread of the story.  The tender touch of Freddie (Joseph Wise-Nash) checking on another boy was magical and honest.  The shattering of the innocence of boyhood was played admirably Percy (William Gilchrist) with a clear arc of his character's story line.  His hiding under the step comforted by his teddy bear was priceless.

The roller door, upstage, opens and an armed soldier enters.  The boys are curious at his arrival, and gradually gain his confidence and leave - rescued from their ordeal.  Ralph (Dominic North)  sits at the front of the stage looking into the audience reflecting upon their collective experience and the future of mankind. This image is powerful as he could become the new theatre ghost.

Lighting design by Chris Davey enhances the various atmospheres to emphasise order, precision and discipline to the resulting fear, terror and savagery.  Chris Davey does so in many ways including dimming, focusing, spotlights, back-lighting and side lighting.  Lighting up the auditorium has a duel effect of the boy's exploring beyond the stage and more importantly exposes the audience members as potential victims or allies.  This effect makes many in the audience sit upright and take stock that they are also exposed.  This is a mirror to our world; as it could happen to anyone if you were in the boy's situation.

Music by Terry Davies builds from the military precision to foretelling doom to savage crescendos. Terry Davies' beat underscores many sections of the music to create a pulsating heart beat racing and trying to catch its breath.

There was not a weak performance in "Lord of the Flies",  and Matthew Bourne, Scott Ambler and  New Adventures & Re:Bourne should be proud of not only their theatrical work, but more importantly their work in developing these fine young men.

The calibre of the dancing was terrific and Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne should be very happy.  The younger performers were watching their role models and were being mentored as to how men dance with masculinity and  strength.  These fine performers were so well rehearsed and showed that dance can display so many levels of emotional sensibilities and human responses.

I adore the story telling by Matthew BourneScott Ambler and company as they make story accessible and understandable while many other dance works lack his clarity and precision.

I am saddened as I would like to see this production of "Lord of the Flies" again due to the depth of complex staging and specific direction for each character.  At times, there was so much happening that I did not want to miss out on the growth (or demise) of each character.  Mind you, the audience focus was central in the direction when required to ensure we did not miss out on the key elements of the story.

The programme for "Lord of the Flies" was good value as there was only one half page of advertisements on the inner back cover that showed the sponsors and partners.  I wanted the programme to include a short synopsis of some of the key events or a summary of the adaptation of the book.

New Adventures & Re:Bourne is one of the most accessible dance companies in the world due to their rich collective of talent in this company.   Matthew Bourne is a genius to develop so much talent internationally and I long to see this company again soon.

I am very keen to see more works by New Adventures & Re:Bourne, in particular The Car Man, The Red Shoes, The Sleeping BeautyCinderella, Dorian Gray, Nutcracker, Play Without Words, Highland Fling and Early Adventures as I have seen Swan Lake and Edward Scissorhands.

Overall "Lord of the Flies" obtains an 8/10.  My partner gave it a 5/10 as it went on far too long for his liking.


Note:  (When researching the links for dancers and artistic staff, I found the 32 page Teacher Resource pack on the New Adventures & Re:Bourne website.  I did not change my review and will read the Teacher Resource Pack to enhance my experience.  This is what great theatre does - it lingers on.)

The five page synopsis in the New Adventures & Re:Bourne website is brilliant and I wish this had been included into the programme.