Thursday 26 October 2017

2017 Melbourne Festival Summary


Melbourne Festival summary 26th October 2017

The 2017 Melbourne Festival was the 31st festival that I have attended and I provide my summary:

Buying tickets:

We bought our tickets at the launch at the Melbourne Recital Centre. I always buy our tickets on the first day of tickets going on sale.  The young lady at the Melbourne Recital Centre was most helpful.

Brochure:

The Melbourne Festival brochure has the planner via each venue.  I have changed my opinion and am now convinced that I prefer this format compared to naming the shows down the left column.

Venue announcements:

I am not impressed with the inconsistent pre-show announcements at each venue.

I was very impressed with the usher who was proactive at "Backbone".

The pre-show announcement for “Ever” at The Temperance Hall in South Melbourne needed more vocal projection and authority to command attention.

In 31 years of attending the Melbourne Festival, and seeing many shows each year, there is only one show that we have attended that has started on time.  Interestingly it was driven by technology and time.  The only show to begin on time was "Since I Suppose."

The use of mobile phones was a problem at “Under Seige” and “The Wrap”.  Also the talking from the audience during “The Wrap” begs the question why people went to the show.

My Favourite show:

My favourite shows this year are hard to split as they all received a 9/10.  Though I think “Germinal” was the best for its emotional connection.  This show obtained a 9/10.

Even though “A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol” obtained an 8.5/10 it was also the most emotionally engaging show with  “Germinal”.

Dance wise I think “In Plan” used technology in a more appropriate and balanced way than the over produced “Tree of Codes” where the technology took focus away from the dancing.

Congratulations to Jonathon Holloway and his team at the MelbourneFestival for the second best festival that I have attended.  The best was his 2016 festival.

Overall the 2017 MelbourneFestival gets a mean average of 8.029/10.  This is a great score that had a consistently high standard and we only saw two shows that brought this score down.



Show
Score
Backbone
9
The Inauguration
9
Voyage of Time
7.5
Under Siege
8
Black Rider
8.5
Dark Circus
9
All of My Friends Were There
8.5
Caravan
8
The Season
7.5
A Requiem for Cambodia: Bangsokol
8.5
More Up A Tree
5
In Plan
9
Ever
7
7 Pleasures
8
Tree of Codes
9
Germinal
9
Taylor Mac: The Wrap
6


 Total
136.5/17
Average
8.029



Germinal, L'Amicale De Production, Malthouse Theatre's Merlyn Theatre, Melbourne Festival, Saturday October 20th 2017

Germinal, L'Amicale De Production, Merlyn Theatre at The Malthouse Theatre for the Melbourne Festival, Saturday October 20th 2017

"Germinal" was presented by L'Amicale De Productions with concept and direction by Halory Goerger and Antione Defoort at the Malthouse Theatre's Merlyn Theatre for the Melbourne Festival, Saturday day October 20th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and it is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Germinal" was presented by L'Amicale De Productions with concept and direction by Halory Goerger and Antione Defoort at the Malthouse Theatre's Merlyn Theatre for the Melbourne Festival, Saturday day October 20th 2017

"Germinal" is a very clever piece of theatre that provided a heart and an emotional connection that is so lacking with many theatre productions.  My heart and body is full of electricity after the show.

The opening was playful with the lights going down then tricking us by coming back on.  This lighting sequence was repeated and then went to black out.  The lights came up slowly as if from Genesis and the beginning.

Four people were revealed on stage playing with equipment sliding levers.  Halory Goerger appeared to be having difficulty which could have been a part of the show as he announced this should not be happening.  We are having a few technical difficulties.  A stage manager appeared and they played around with some levers and looked up at the lights and up to the technical crew as adjustments were made.  This disruption could easily have been a part of the show as they were discussing the technical issues as a metaphor about the origins of life - as to whether it was science, creationist, or another possible theory.  I thought that this disruption was a part of the show and loved it.  Though the running time was more than the allotted one hour and twenty minutes that suggested it was a genuine technical hitch.  I would keep it in for the philosophical question.

The banter between the actors is so funny and thought provoking.  Halory GoergerAntione Defoort, Arnaud Boulogn and Beatriz Setien are brilliant as they work together seamlessly.

They gradually introduced thought, objects, language and so many aspects of life.  The thoughts were written on the back in what could be described as text boxes.  This was very playful with the four characters introduced but only two text boxes were available for writing their thoughts.  They were using their control panels to express their thoughts.  The sequence built organically with structure to allow for various thought processes.  They even played with the concept of ventriloquism and being able to throw their voices or thoughts.. They played with the concept of defining who was speaking as if writing a script and naming the person who was speaking.  They gradually got rid of the control panels.

Beatriz Setien at one stage obtained a pick axe and cut a hole in the stage to reveal a microphone.  An entire sequence followed about finding sound and their voices.  Whoever was holding the microphone had the control and the power.  The discovery of any new object was fascinating and childlike as they tried to make sense and understand what, how and why things worked.  The playfulness of the microphone to tap it and discover that it made a sound intrigued them.  This led to the tapping of the microphone on various objects including each other's head to discover the famous "poc poc" sound.  They played with the microphone tapping it on every object that they had already found.  This was a recap sequence that was so much fun.  Some objects did not make a sound when they used the microphone as in tapping the empty hole.

Using their new found wisdom they began categorising their thoughts as "Poc poc" or "Non poc poc".  It became an academic exercise in the absurd and made fun of any meeting or process.  In particular it created their version of the Johari Window.  "Poc poc" and "Non poc poc" will become in-jokes as was the phrase "Could it be? Could it be?" from Ronnie Burkett and his puppet shows at previous Melbourne Festivals.

The opening sequences of "Germinal" reminded me at times of "Gilligan's Island" or any film/story where the characters are stranded and have to discover their environment and learn how to survive.  Here the cast of "Germinal" were learning about how to make sense of their environment, and as such was deeper than the superficial survival skills.

A guitar was discovered and more antics followed to learn about this unusual object and to learn about musical concepts: rhythm, pitch, timing and harmonies.

They played with singing as a means of communication that suggested musical theatre and opera.

A laptop was discovered to provide order and assist in categorising their findings.  It was a great play on the Microsoft Windows Word format with headings such as Display, Environment, and Language etc.  They played with each of these categories, for example the environments of Forest, Swamp were discovered.  When playing with the language option they started speaking in Japanese.  This was clever and so entertaining.

The setting was three side black walls and a raised stage that was divided into dark grey cubes.  These could be destroyed at will for when the axe was used to reveal the microphone or the pulley system to reveal the sound speaker.

They discovered what could be a pool of water that looked like a spa bath.  One sat in the pool, another dived into the pool and the others then also got in.  They found electronic drums that they played with to introduce other concepts of anger, denial, negotiation etc. This section was like the five stages of grief.

I loved the summary at the end when the "End" was nigh.  The cast summarised the whole show with the aid of all of the words that we were introduced to throughout the show. They created a rhythm and a chant as they played their electronic musical drums. 

"Germinal" is a very thought provoking work that is extremely entertaining.  At no time does it try to dictate to us but rather gets us to think about concepts.

We were lucky to attend a Question and Answer session convened by Matthew Lutton, the Artistic Director from the Malthouse Theatre after the show.  I had to share with them after I heard they do not have theatre backgrounds about "The Serpent" by Jean-Claude Van-Itallie and directed by Joseph Chaikin at the Open Theatre in New York.  The opening sequence of light reminded me of the Genesis section from "The Serpent" from a production in Melbourne directed by Norman Southerby in about 1975.

"Germinal"also reminded me of a live version of aspects from "History of the Universe in 2 Hours" shown on the History Channel.

"Germinal" is a celebration of life and freedom as this cast muse and ponder on the meaning of many concepts, particularly when they summarise the whole show as if in a spa bath.  
"Germinal" feels joyful and grateful for life and existence.

"Germinal" obtained a 9/10 and my partner gave it a 9.5/10.

"Germinal" is a great companion piece to this year's show  "7 Pleasures" from the Genesis perspective.

Wednesday 25 October 2017

Tree Of Codes, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Friday October 20th 2017

"Tree Of Codes", State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne for the Melbourne Festival, Friday October 20th 2017


"Tree Of Codes" was presented as part of the Melbourne Festival at the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne on Friday October 20th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and it is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Tree Of Codes" choreographed by Wayne McGregor was presented as part of the Melbourne Festival at the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne on Friday October 20th 2017

In preparing the theatre, the EXIT signs were covered over as the reflections would interfere with many of the illusions.  When leaving the theatre after the show, the step lights had been covered over so as not to destroy the visual illusions of the reflections.

Sections for "Tree Of Codes" included:

The house lights dimmed and went down.

Lights illuminated from either side of the stage into the audience.

The lights dimmed on each side of the stage.

An orange spot light focused on my partner.  Friends of ours that were sitting in S Row, thought he was going up on stage as the light was so prominent on my partner.  They said it was spooky.

Darkness fell.

Dancing dots appeared on stage that reminded me of a troupe that I had seen recently on "America's Got Talent".  Maybe this troupe had been influenced by Wayne McGregor's "Tree Of Codes".  If so, this troupe showed the wonderful influence of Wayne McGregor, dance and technology via their contribution on mainstream competition on television.

Ten silver shapes on black stands were wheeled on in a blackout.  Each mirrored silver shape had a central hole.  A hand appeared through each of the central holes to show the different reflections, and to distinguish that each of the ten shapes had a different hand as they each did different movements.  Then they would trick our perspective by sometimes having the ten hands perform the same actions.  They would then alternate between individual and synchronised movements.

The lights came up slowly from a dark stage to reveal a stage-width-and-height-sized-mirror that hung upstage.  You could see the audience in this enormous mirror that was reminiscent of "Music and the Mirror" from "A Chorus Line".

The orange spot light returned and this time the images were reflected and appeared on stage in a large mirror upstage.  This orange spotlight moved throughout the theatre to show the reflection on the mirror.  You could see the reflection of the light in the mirror and where it focused on audience members.

Two dancers in nude briefs did a pas de deux in front of the mirror.

Then four dancers did a pas de quatre in front of the mirror.  We were gradually building the challenge to our perception of the perspectives of what we would see.  We questioned ourselves about what was real and what was being reflected.

Then twelve dancers danced various combinations.  Rarely were more than two dancers doing the same moves.

The back mirror shape changed.

A bank of red fluoro type lights was flown in to show the reflection in the mirror.

Another mirror wall was flown in downstage and two female dancers danced in front to show us their reflection in this new mirror.

Then a sole dancer danced in front of the downstage mirror and another dancer danced in between the two mirrors.  This showed the different types of reflections in the front mirror and the dancer in the middle had multiple reflections.

There were then variations of this theme with all of the twelve dancers in different combinations either in front of the downstage mirror or in between.  More colour was used in the t-shirts and costumes to differentiate the dancers behind the front mirror to those wearing plainer colours in the downstage area.  This was again to play with our sense of perspective to create a sense of reality and comfort, and then to distort our view.  The whole show was a human kaleidoscope that gradually built up with gradual changes pulsating and interspersed with reality checks.

This sequence finished with a dancer in the front dancing with a dancer in the middle section.  It was a pas de deux with a mirror in between.

The back mirror had a semi circular light outline.  Eventually this was moved as the mirror changed shape to allow the dancers entrances either side of the mirror.   Depending upon where you sat in the theatre, it appeared that the dancers were coming out of a potentially cracked mirror.  This was another play on our sense of perspective.

Dancers danced downstage and the back mirror was manipulated in such a way to distort our view as if the dancers were in full view downstage and their reflections appeared to either be on a raked stage or dancing in a pit as their bodies disappeared.  To challenge us even more was when one or two dancers would walk across this middle section and be fully visible while the reflections of others were disappearing below or raised up.  This was very similar to Cirque De Solei's "O" in Las Vegas where the performers appear to be walking on water, or walk into the water until they are fully submerged.  Visually it was stunning and challenging as I watched two large white-ish coloured pulley systems counter balance the rear mirrors to distort our view.  Very clever and sophisticated technology was used throughout the show.

I was so curious about the location of two banks of red lights that I could see in either side of the mirror.  I turned to see where they were located in the theatre and could not see them.  The reflections were so distinct on either side of the stage and it was magical to not be able to find their origin.  I am still in awe as to where they originated.

When debriefing with my fellow seven audience members who sat in different sections of the audience, those in the "S" row could clearly see these raked and disappearing illusions while friends sitting in closer seats in "C" row missed this illusion.   My cousin who flew from Sydney to see the show sat in "K" row and was able to see the raked stage illusion. We sat in "BB" row which in some ways was too close but in other ways was fascinating.  My partner, sitting next to me, could not see this rake or sinking illusion.  I would like to see this show again further back.

A larger mirror full of many rectangular panels and two large circular panels flew very close to the main curtain.  There were hinges to be seen and I knew something special would occur.  These two large circles began to rotate slowly within the large mirrored panelled wall.  The circles reflected images and lights into the audience and onto the back cyclorama blue wall.  These large circles then rotated in the opposite direction.

The orange spotlights returned as small lights from the back wall.  They intensified their light and shone again into the audience focusing on individuals and the reflections appeared on the mirrors.  At the finale there were two large orange reflections of audience members on the back wall.

Wayne McGregor's choreography was beautifully realised by the sublime dancers with superb technique.  I am curious about any influence or relationship from Laban notation, Benesh notation or Trisha Brown with her diagrammatic score (a numerical-spatial-cube) from "Lotus" (1975).  At times the choreography reminded me of the computer generated versions of all three.

The dancers were incredibly fit athletes with consummate artistry and technique.  Their extensions were so high and their rond de jambe en l'air were dynamic and powerful as they sliced the air.  Their attitudes derriere were exquisitely pure.  The pas de deux throughout were solid, secure and electric.

The dancing was sublime but the choreography at times felt repetitive with the style.  I sound spoiled for choice with such incredible performances but I have seen a lot of good choreography and thought there was something missing.  The pace had such a bland sameness that it highlighted the needed for some variation.  It could have been the textures and qualities were so similar rather than layering various qualities and timing.  There was a flow that seduced me but I wanted more depth of intensity of movements.

The audience was selfishly spoiled with the high standard of dance.  As such the choreography was overwhelming as there was too much action at times.  Wayne McGregor's choreography is so frenetic and unrelenting with no respite to savour sequences.  I begged for some simultaneous work or quiet times to allow for reflection.  As Stephen Sondheim, says: audiences need time to digest lyrics.  Here, the audience needed time to digest the choreographed movements. The audience was gasping for breath and needed time to breath.  When the pauses did occur they created slight trough between the constant peaks in dance.

By being spoiled with such incredible quality of dance, music and technology the audience can become a bit blase and expect this from every show.  I felt cheated at missing many of the incredible dance variations as there was too much happening.

Two female dancers, that look like twins, even with their blonde and pink hair, danced magnificently. When they danced together it challenged us again to question whether we were seeing double.

Music by Jamie XX was pulsating and engaging.

The Visual Concept by Olafur Eliasson, which included the lighting and design, was sensational and at times overwhelming that detracted from the dance.

"Tree Of Codes"  is based on the Jonathon Safran Foer book "Tree of Codes" which is based on the "Street of Crocodiles" by Bruno Schultz that was made into a short film.  Scissors hang from above in the short animated film.  I wonder if "Under Siege" designers obtained their scissor designs idea from this short movie.  Either way there are two shows that have hanging scissors imagery - one on stage and the other on film! 

"Tree Of Codes" provided a good companion piece to "More Up A Tree" with the mirrored cube that played at The Substation.  "Tree Of Codes" focused so heavily on the technology that at times drew focus away from the brilliant dancing.

In some ways I think the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne was the wrong venue and needed to be at a similar venue to the Park Avenue Armory in New York.  I question the use of the State Theatre as the most appropriate venue when I looked at the Park Avenue Armory time lapse photography of the staging set up from Wayne McGregor's brilliant site.

The videos provided on Wayne McGregor's site allow the audience to savour their experience and this is what I mean about a holistic experience.  The Wayne McGregor's site allows the audience to be prepared and anticipate an event in conjunction with any advertising and marketing before attending a show.  We can then experience the show and then revisit the Wayne McGregor's site to reflect and be informed or educated.

"Tree Of Codes" was presented as part of the Melbourne Festival at the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne on Friday October 20th 2017

"Tree Of Codes"  obtained a 9/10.

Monday 23 October 2017

7 Pleasures, Mette Ingvartsen, Playhouse Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne for the Melbourne Festival, Thursday October 19th 2017

"7 Pleasures", for the Melbourne Festival at the Playhouse Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Thursday October 19th 2017


"7 Pleasures" was presented by Mette Ingvartsen for the Melbourne Festival at the Playhouse TheatreArts Centre Melbourne, on Thursday October 19th 2017.

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"7 Pleasures" was presented by Mette Ingvartsen for the Melbourne Festival at the Playhouse TheatreArts Centre Melbourne, on Thursday October 19th 2017.

The seven pleasures could be related to the Laban eight basic efforts of Press, Thrust, Wring, Slash, Glide, Dab, Float, and Flick.   There could be the underlying rhythms or aspects of effort involved.

Alternatively the seven dance movements: plie to bend, releve to rise, etendre (tende) to stretch, saute to spring, glise to glide, elance to dart, tourne to turn were also apparent throughout the piece.  An eighth is battu to beat.

The seven pleasures could be your seven favourite aspects and what you see in the piece.  It could be your seven fetishes or indulgences.

I could see many people comparing this show to the most obvious seven deadly sins, and that would be another perspective to this work.

This work is very clever as you can see it from so many different perspectives: the seven virtues, seven deadly sins, and some will laugh and say you could even see the seven dwarfs.  That is the beauty of the Melbourne Festival  as it opens us to discussion and challenges us.  For these reasons, this show, "7 Pleasures" is pure Melbourne Festival fare at its best.

Waiting in the foyer I noticed people appearing from a corridor wearing casual clothes,  They were obviously some of the dancers,  and they could have mingled more in the crowd and not been so prominent standing in small groups.  Also some should have been wearing more formal attire or suits to actually surprise and challenge us when the big reveals occurred.

The house lights were still alighted when gradually some of the dancers pretending to be audience members would begin to undress.  They were the dancers.  Some were seated and a few stood in the aisles.  We had a guy in our row and one seated in front of us who began to undress.  They moved to the stage and formed a group overlapping on top of other dancers upstage right.  A lady behind us stood and took off her jacket to the surprise of her friends and received a welcome laugh.  Imagine if someone from the audience did join in?!

There were three distinct parts to the show.  The first had the dancers stripped and then formed a unit and moved as one across the stage, over the settee, under and over the table.  They proceeded to merge with a lady who was sprawled out over the lone black lounge chair.

The first section was a discovery of self and others as the dancers mainly had their eyes closed.  They were like new born babies discovering their bodies and adjusting to their new environment.

There was an extended section where the dancers were dabbing, rubbing and patting each other.   At times it was very blokey and sporty as if in the showers after a football game, using congratulatory slaps and pats of encouragement.  In some ways it reminded me of the kindergarten song about how each body part is joined together in "Dem Bones".

The contact work requires enormous trust and relaxation to be able to support another person.  Any tension can be disastrous.

Another phrase had the dancers all rolling back and forth across each other.

A phallic shaped cactus sat just off centre stage to the downstage right.  A woman licked the cactus leaves as if exploring her taste bud sensations.  It looked quite dangerous as the leaves appeared to be quite sharp.  Later a man repeated the licking of the leaves which is both the kinaesthetic and taste sensation.

The group all disbanded and went their separate ways.  One went to the back beaded curtain, another on a thick rubbery looking mat, another to the cactus, others to chairs.  Each was finding their individuality and expression.  The lady explored the mat's surface by stretching out and then rolled herself into the mat as if a caterpillar was forming a cocoon for a beautiful butterfly to emerge.

There was a section with metal cooking bowls.  Tapping and being used in so many creative ways.

A section included more ecstatic movements that culminated in a build up to a release or orgasmic conclusion.  No sexual penetration as it was tantric in their bouncing up and down on the spot.

The second section where the lights dimmed represented the after glow or the "little death" (la petite mort) with sensual activities of rest, relief or satisfaction.  This was genteel, caring and sensual. The lighting of a post-coital-cigarette action (as per the classic movies) was missing.  Cleansing a body by one couple was included which also drew strong links of love and mortality when washing a dead body.  Each dancer had their own actions and gestures during this contemplative section.

Two orange ropes hung from the lighting-rig-beams above and counter balanced each other.  A dancer was pulling on the end of one orange rope and a light came on at the other end of the orange rope.  It turned out that there were lights at the ends of the ropes and it could be the inner afterglow of sexual activities as a "light bulb" moment of an orgasm.  On stage right the long haired man was using his mouth to engage with the ropes and tying it around his neck.  Someone behind me groaned in recognition of his simulated auto-erotica-asphyxiation.

Silver balls were placed on dancers' backs as they arched and rounded their backs to allow the silver ball to trace their spine.  They were balancing the silver ball and not allowing it to fall off their backs.  They were like pin ball machines and rewarded for their achievement.

There was a section that I called "Prowess" where each dancer was using an object to show they had the biggest or best accoutrements.  The young man used a long black tube that could be demonstrating length.  Another was using a chair, while someone else was using cushions to boost their sexual advantage.

There was a section that replicated masturbation or self pleasure.  It was very indulgent with each dancer using a technique individual to their character's needs and desires.  Images of rope pulling simulated masturbation.  While the tug-of-war duo simulated mutual masturbation.

Some of the dancers stripped off items of clothing as others put these items of clothing on as if second hand clothes.

This was the only section where I remembered actual groping of breasts.

There was a moment when some of those wearing black would pull down their pants and expose themselves.  One guy looked between a woman's legs as her pants and underwear had been pulled down.  He was peeping through her legs that framed the action of other dancers.  There was so much action happening and too many places on stage to watch.  Sadly, I missed how the lady who had been tied to the underside of the table had been released.

Parts of this section were quite brutal when they used cushions to smother another dancer or catch them.

There was a section where the dancers were engaged, pulsating or writhing with objects.  Sometimes it was very funny.  Other times it was inventive and held our curiosity. It could be simulated sex or even new and possible fetishes. As per the title, we do not know what are your personal seven pleasures?

The final section had half the ensemble put on black clothes.  It was very discriminating and excluding as the naked people were outcasts as they were relegated to the the large settee and showed us their bums.  The final section of wearing black involved six bodies laying over the top of the settee as they were observed by those wearing black.  Those showing their bums was punishment as if they were on display and showing their wares to be auctioned off in the slave trade or as meat in a butcher's shop.  Those in black stood and observed as if keeping guard.  It could be the pleasure of denial.

Dancers swapping clothes was simulating cross dressing and it could mean many other things.  The changing of clothes could be submission and an order to  dress in a particular way to be accepted. It could have been the uniform - as Melbournians wear a lot of black!

The final section involved the cast creating a robot or machine with sounds.  The sounds included the mmm of pleasure and the oohs and aahs with the orgasmic type squeal of satisfaction.  The lady who made the squeal sound moved into the audience as the ensemble holding cushions and other items stood in a row across the stage.  The lady climbed over the seats in the audience.  I was prepared to repeat the sound "nuh" if needed. Thankfully this was not required.

These sounds were harmonious and showed satisfaction and appreciation.  The sounds were animalistic revealing that humans too are animals and have sexual needs.  These sounds were of communication and mutual respect to identify and direct your attention.

Enthusiastic applause followed as half the cast were still in their birthday suits.

Sir Robert Helpmann had famously said about body parts "The trouble with nude dancing is that not everything stops when the music stops."  He was so right with the men in particular with the "top dog" or "alpha male" standing on a large black box vigorously moving and his manhood on display.  This alpha male received a lot of audience attention!

After the house lights came on a gentleman called out "The next performance is in Saudi Arabia" and someone responded "Very funny!"

"7 Pleasures" was not for everyone as one person left after about forty minutes and then about eight people left the show at about the one hour mark.

"7 Pleasures" is a challenging work as it makes you think.  The work could be divided into the three sections of birth, death and rebirth.  The birth was simulated via the entry under the table, or over the table as in a caesarean birth.   The second section was like a rest with la petite mort.  While the last section was a rebirth and remaking of the society which drew parallels to fascist regimes such as Hitler as they wore the black uniforms.

The show could also be perceived as the seven days of creation from Genesis.  The following is a very rough example of the Genesis perception.  Day one: the house lights were on and then they dimmed as the dancers took their position upstage right. Day two:  the dancers went their separate ways to discover their senses. Day three: they gathered together (maybe in an orgy).  Day four: dividing the day from night with the use of the hanging lights section.  Day five: creation of different creatures. Also the monsters were created in the guise of the dancers in black appearing menacing.  Day six:  Be fruitful and multiply.   Day seven: a day of rest as the ensemble chanted and approached the audience ceremoniously.

Yes there could be many different, or some say, ridiculous interpretations.  The seven dwarfs of menopause could be another interpretation.  Whatever is your preferred interpretation the show stretches your thinking into new possibilities.  This show opens up discussion.

At first we felt a bit cheated as the show began at about 7.42 pm and finished at about 9.07 pm.  However, if you factor in the pre-show announcement when waiting in the foyer, this may have been the beginning of the performance with the dancers coming through and going to the toilets.  If so, then this makes it the advertised one hour and forty minutes.

There are so many wonderful memories about this show that I wrote words to remind me of different moments.

The  power of suggestion, the simulated sex was very graphic and in some ways was more confronting than pornography.  Do not get me wrong as the extreme puritans and even those opposed to pornography, who have not seen enough porn to judge my comments or assessment need to open their eyes.  I am not suggesting that this show is pornographic but opens up discussion of how society is exposed to so many suggestive possibilities and to subliminal messages in the media, advertising and literature.  It got me thinking how we sexualise society from such a young age.

I wish someone would elaborate on my offerings and different perspectives, as analysis of this show would make a great thesis for a dance or theatre student.  (If you do, please at least have the courtesy to quote this source!)

I would love to know the process of how they created and rehearsed this work.  How do you rehearse an understudy or replacement cast member?  I am fascinated by the process.  The cast must have some amazing stories about the reactions of different audiences from around the world.  Curiously, I would love to hear more of these funny, weird and different stories from the cast and crew.

This is a wonderful example of a festival show to challenge, and, potentially, divide audiences.

I could easily see this show again as I am in awe at their physical strength and stamina that was sadly lacking in another dance work at this 2017 Melbourne Festival.

"7 Pleasures" obtained an 8/10.

"Germinal" is a great companion piece to "7 Pleasures" from the Genesis perspective.

Sunday 22 October 2017

The Wrap, by Taylor Mac, The Forum Theatre, Melbourne Festival, Sunday October 22nd 2017

The Wrap, by Taylor Mac, The Forum Theatre, Melbourne Festival, Sunday October 22nd 2017


"The Wrap"  by Taylor Mac was presented at the Forum Theatre for the Melbourne Festival for one night only on Sunday October 22nd 2017.

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and it is more of a stream of consciousness.

"The Wrap"  by Taylor Mac was presented at the Forum Theatre for the Melbourne Festival for one night only on Sunday October 22nd 2017.

No programme was available for the event.

"The Wrap" by Taylor Mac was meant to be an event to close the Melbourne Festival and sadly was not up to the standard of the "The Inauguration".  We were expecting a party, celebration, and an event to be remembered.  We thought there would be the obligatory thanking of the Melbourne Festival staff and local artists. Yes this occurred but briefly so with no mention of Jonathon Holloway.

The show began at 7.10 pm and was over at 8.20 pm as he had a 12.30 or 12.45 am flight to Cambodia.   He basically apologised due to the mix up in the time thinking he was flying out a day later.  This is not good project management. 

There was a lack of atmosphere and the audience participation was negligible.  The nine straight men that came on stage and then "camped it up" was probably the most fun for the night.  The ceremonial funereal exit of the substitute Judy Garland received an enthusiastic reception as a lady was carried out to the foyer to Taylor Mac singing.

Prince's song "Purple Rain" received an enthusiastic response and looked scant with about thirty purple balloons thrown into the crowd.

The finale to Ted Nugent's song was supposed to be a final Prom night dance as we had been instructed at "The Inauguration".  Here the instructions were minimalist and the audience did not have the same level of cooperation or respect as per the Hamer Hall audience.  There it was a special event.  Here it felt forced and the talking of audience had to be shushed by Taylor Mac.  There was nothing special about this section, especially when there were quite a few people not dancing with anyone.  To add insult to the meaning of this finale some people danced with a person of the opposite sex rather than dancing with someone of the same sex.  It was a knife into the wounds to add insult to injury into the meaning and spirit of this finale.  Thankfully, we have great memories of "The Inauguration" and the sensational Prom night dance finale.

The preamble to the encore that we heard at "The Inauguration" was fun and engaging.  Here it felt as if he just wanted to get off the stage and make that flight.  This was understandable too.

There was a crowd surfing moment that was repeated in the finale encore to rapturous applause.

The Melbourne Festival Lounge upstairs at the Forum Theatre looks fabulous and has a wonderful ambiance with little nooks and crannies to make a small group cosy.  I wish this venue was open for this type of pre-show and post-show drinks as per the Campbell Bar at Grand Central Station in New York.

Many in the audience for "The Wrap" were using their mobile phones: texting or searching during the show.  Some took photos and video of the show.  As we stood up the very back of the theatre we could see a lot or rude people talking very loudly during the show and pre-occupied with their phones.  Why did they bother coming to the show? 

The show ran for seventy minutes which was twenty minutes shorter than scheduled. 


"The Wrap" obtained a 6/10 while my partner gave it a 4/10 as he was very disappointed.

Wednesday 18 October 2017

Ever, Phillip Adams Ballet Lab, Temperance Hall for the Melbourne Festival, Wednesday October 18th 2017

Ever, Phillip Adams Ballet Lab, Temperance Hall for the Melbourne Festival, Wednesday October 18th 2017

"Ever", by Phillip Adams Ballet Lab was presented at the Temperance Hall for the Melbourne Festival, on Wednesday October 18th 2017.

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and it is more of a stream of consciousness.


"Ever", by Phillip Adams Ballet Lab was presented at the Temperance Hall for the Melbourne Festival, on Wednesday October 18th 2017.

It was exciting to be attending "Ever" to revisit the Temperance Hall that was the former home of Anthill Theatre in the 1980's and early 1990's.  There are new toilets and a basic bar upstairs.

The Front of House Manager was welcoming and informed us about the location of the bar upstairs, and the toilets.  She notified us that the bar would close five minutes prior to the start of the show.  Our names were marked off on a list which was good to clarify the ticket holders and also good for a safety check in case of an emergency.

A programme was offered which was a small white brochure, and not in the style of the other Melbourne Festival programmes.  Sadly the information I wanted to read was not in the programme but was posted on a narrow corridor behind the staircase leading to the outside toilets rather than the more prominent location of the larger foyer walls.  

On the wall was posted photos of the artistic staff and dancers.  Some of the dancers had a website address at the conclusion of their individual biographies.  Sadly no website address was posted on the wall for Phillip Adams Ballet Lab, nor was it in the one page programme.  This is a poor oversight and shows a lack of marketing and business acumen.  I want a holistic experience that ticks all of the boxes.

The Front of House Manage spoke to the audience members downstairs to explain that she would be opening the doors after she makes an announcement when the people upstairs came down.  She also told us to enter as far as possible into the venue.

She then tried to make an announcement and a few people from downstairs were talking loudly.  I "hushed" loudly to allow the young lady some respect and draw attention to her announcement.  This could have been better handled by ringing a bell or projecting her voice to proclaim an announcement.  For example "May I have your attention please".

The night was very warm and the audience were fanning themselves as they waited for the show.

Set and Lighting Design by Matthew Adey created a pure backdrop of the space that could be from any bridal chapel.  For some reason the set instantly reminded me of the final scene from "Carousel" as if Billy Bigelow had come from heaven.  The long rectangular room was white with a white picket fence in a large rectangular "U" shape.  The stage area at the furthest end had a white roller type curtain.  A large black machine was hanging from above and looked as if it was a projector that may be used on the white curtain that would double as a screen.    Two rocking chairs sat either side of and in front of the raised stage.  Yes, I observed well and more of that later.

The show started at about 8.05 pm.  Two men and two ladies, all wearing white, walked out through a gate. They positioned themselves centre stage in a circle.  The music began and they began their dancing.  Each dancer had a different phrase.  They all repeated many of the phrases and it was in some ways a cannon effect.

Costumes by Akira Isogawa pay homage to the Quakers, Shakers and other puritanical people.  The open under-arm section allowed the dancers' bodies to breath and also provided a better line to the costumes.  The men's costumes juxtaposed the ruggedness of the white cowboy chaps worn over the top of pure white trousers.  They were not distasteful or disrespectful; they were paying homage to the puritanical people.

The first section went for about ten minutes and was full on dance.  I appreciate it was a warm night and that there was no air-conditioning or air flow, but the dancers were breathing very heavily at the end of this section.  To me they did not appear show fit as dancers usually have to appear effortless.  We were witnessing a lot of effort.

The music for the first half was "Shaker Loops" by John Adams.

At one stage the three women sported white socks and white roller skates.  They glided around the space some more effortlessly than others as trepidation and caution was apparent.

Two separate pas de deux were danced with the two men supporting a different lady on skates.  Some of it was well done, while the supporting skills varied.  One example was the difference in the hand to hand support offered.  One couple used both hands across while the other lady used both of her hands on his one arm.  It looked clunky and not very supportive from a pas de deux perspective.

Dance wise, the extensions were not complete.  Relaxed feet was a common choreographic device, as per Dianne McPherson's 1980 choreography at VCA performances at Kew High School.  Diane McPherson, a Julliard School Graduate was vilified by the Anne Woolliams the VCA Dean at the time for such choreography.  Sadly she left her tenure at VCA as her choreography was very challenging and her teaching was brilliant, electric and encouraging.

The fouette sautes were not sharp enough in their precision and changes of direction. Plus some of the extensions were not fully extended and appeared to be relaxed attitude derriere on many occasions.

There is a section that reminds me of the Wild West, cowboys and lassos. First one lady whips her lasso around and then the guys do similar actions.

Some of the precision and foot work was unrefined - particularly the jumping as they landed without rolling through their feet.  If they do not roll through the foot then they may end up with shin splints.

A lift over the shoulder was very ungraceful by one couple.  The lady looked like a potato bag thrown over his shoulder.

A solo by a young lady was full of shaking and other gestures.  This was the best dancing for the evening as she demonstrated many different intensities and moods as she sliced the air with so much emotion.  Sadly I cannot identify her due to a lack of programme details as the photos on the website do not look like her.  This young lady had polish and demonstrated that contemporary dance needs not be a poor cousin to other dance forms.

The best part was the four dancing together as in a contact release of rippling, and cause and effect as they bounced off each other.  This contact section flowed better than other sections of the choreography.

A man in a black hat entered. He danced and the others all reacted with various actions and gestures.  Some movements looked shameful as the lady covered her face, while others were respectful as if praying.  Other movements appeared as if tilling or ploughing the crops.

The four dancers in white and the man in black left the space.

The music changed to "Metamorphosen" by Richard Strauss and two men in black appeared.  They opened a hatch underneath the stage and pulled on two large black tapes.  They hauled out what looked like a blue plastic swimming pool and stretched this full length of the stage to the double exit doors.  They spread it out and it looked as if it was going to be inflated.

A short video by James Wright played for about 15 minutes on the white screen.  A man's hands dipped into paint that he then spread, splattered or stroked onto long ribbons.  Yellow, red, blue, black, and other colours followed.  I remember watching the colours as they swirled and created patterns as if a kaleidoscope.    I do recall that white came last and the colours all appeared to be those of a Rubik's Cube.


A person sitting near the main double doors just had to check their phone for an extended time during the video.  This was distracting and not a good example to set for the two children sitting close by.  This was rudeness personified.

The blue large swimming pool began inflating and came to life as the film rolled on.  Eventually the blue large swimming pool became a large bouncing mat for pole-vaulters.  Then the white curtain raised and a yellow body bag rolled from the stage and onto the blue large swimming pool.  It was so hot and the poor dancer would have been sweltering in this outfit.  The yellow body bag rolled slowly towards the double doors.  Many audience members began chatting among themselves.

Then a red body bag appeared and began rolling towards the double doors.  Then a blue body bag did the same thing.  Finally a black body bag rolled from the stage and onto the blue large swimming pool.  Audience members were carefully discussing the safety aspect as the black body bag was nearly falling overboard towards our side of the audience.  Gradually the black body bag corrected itself and got back on course towards the double doors.

In some ways this paint dripping was like watching a cricket match with not much action and then, something significant happens as the batter hits a six or someone catches someone out.  The significant action followed and was like coloured cricket balls being caught:

The double doors opened to provide a burst of fresh air and a man appeared with a large contraption with various rectangular cushions in the similar colours to the body bags.  He then catapulted these rectangular cushions towards the various coloured body bags.  Most hit the third body bag and many in the audience laughed and cringed that they hit "the head" many times.  Sympathy rose from the audience.

The yellow body bag reached the end and the blue large swimming pool structure began to deflate.  The other coloured body bags had difficulty rolling any further.

Black out.

Applause as the body bags lay still.  Maybe the paint needed to dry out.  More applause followed.  The zipper of one body bag opened slighting as the dancer wanted some fresh air on this very warm night.  The audience left I think cognisant that the dancers needed to get out of these oppressive costumes on such a stifling night..

"Ever" was good quality Melbourne Festival dance that challenged us as per some of the earlier dance programmes scheduled in the 1980's and 1990's.  

"Ever" obtained a 7/10.