Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Titanic - The Musical, Stage Art, Chapel Off Chapel, Sunday July 10th 2016

Titanic - The Musical, Stage Art, Chapel Off Chapel, Sunday July 10th 2016


For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

James Cutler the director has created a superb version of "Titanic - The Musical" by Stage Art, at Chapel Off Chapel.  "Titanic" was the 1997 Tony Award winning Broadway musical.  I had tickets when it was being staged in Melbourne after its Sydney season did not tour.  I have seen footage of the opening number on Broadway and was eager to see how they would stage this musical with a reduced cast playing multiple roles.

Well I came home and bought tickets for another viewing it was so good.  My comments of the second viewing are at the end of this review.

The set was a raked stage with an ocean of space to allow for entrances and exits.  The chairs were brought on in the first scene and placed on either side as in a Greek chorus.  We too are the voyeurs and observers of this tragedy. Set design by Simon Coleman, Robbie Carmellotti and James Cutler provided us a floating stage to create depth for both the different class of passengers and when required for the ocean.

The main thing I did not like was the lack of clarity in the projections.  These projections reminded me of the entrance hall to the "Titanic" exhibition both in Melbourne and to a lesser extent the shorter hallway used in the Las Vegas version.  In these exhibitions there was clarity with the projections and the times but in the theatre they were sometimes hard to see against the white outline of the ship's portholes etc.  The second viewing consolidated these thoughts.

The lighting by Giancarlo Salamanca created the haunting effects required to build the tension.  The blasts were simple and effective.  The second viewing confirmed the simplicity of the lighting design to emphasise the emotional tragedy.

Sound Design by Marcello Lo Ricco created such realistic sound effects and reminded me of "Sensurround" used first in the movie "Earthquake" in 1974.  The first time the sound effects are used made the audience all sit up and take note, as they did on the second viewing.

Costume design by Lucy Laurtia imbued the period, though some of the characters did not look as polished as they should - with some ill-fitting uniforms for the male cast.  The ill fitting uniforms were more noticeable on the second viewing and detracted from the quality performers ability to hold their credibility.

I had tears rolling down my face during the farewells and loading of the first class passengers scene.  The truth and sincerity of these actors was breathtaking.  See below for my note on the second viewing.


Musical direction by Kent Ross was terrific.  The singing was melodious and rich as the band played superbly.  There was maybe one or two bung notes in this hugely sung through musical.  The harmonies were sensational and when the whole cast sang - the harmonies were rich and sublime.

The opening number had the passengers come in via the aisles.  This created a sense of excitement as we could only just see them, as they were trying to see this new liner.  Plus the aisles were dressed with ropes and luggage to provide the audience the experience of boarding the liner too.

The hitting of the iceberg left me with a shudder.   The second viewing had me watching how the cast created this moment. 

The "Wake up" announcement to each class of passengers was stirring - with  Henry Etches (Christopher Southall) and Adam Di Martino as a Bellboy on either side of the stage moving to each cabin.  Their door knocking did not have the humour of "The Book of Mormon"!  These superb performers were doing their duty to rouse passengers and also to keep calm.  Their disquiet created superb tension.  This built the tension for the final farewell hug with the captain.

The Third Class (or rats) were caged animals and the use of cast to create a barrier both physically and with four chairs was visually confronting.  The second viewing had my attention more as how the director drew our attention so quickly from the First Class passengers to the Third Class.  This was such a clever and simple transition that has me in awe of James Cutler's skill.

Some of the chairs were used to create the lifeboats.  I had tears rolling down my face during the farewells and  loading of the first class passengers onto the life boats during "To the lifeboats/We'll meet tomorrow".  There was honesty in the depth of respect for these characters by the actors.  The truth and sincerity of these actors was breathtaking.

The boats were lowered.  The wailing and crying was truly disturbing.  The lifeboat sailed away by means of the actors carrying their chairs and solemnly filing across downstage and out into the foyer. Another simple and powerful device to transport us back in time to these historic events.

Three men were left standing on deck.    There was so much happening in this silence and stillness  It is probably the most powerful silence I have ever seen staged in over 51 years of attending theatre - you could hear a pin drop.  The stillness went on for a long period of time and the pauses between the three men's short dialogues were palpable.  They created an honest sense of futility and despair.  The cigarette smoking and trying to make sense of their final hours was gut wrenching.  My heart was pounding at these three men realising and contemplating their fate.

The (deck) chairs falling overboard into the moat around the stage created a sense of realism. The sliding and scrambling up the raked stage was so simple and desperate.  The hanging on to the sides of the ship and each passenger losing their grip and falling into the Atlantic was so simple and so effective.  It goes to show that good theatre does not always need expensive and flashy sets.

Choreography by Rhys Velasquez created a feel for the 1912 era with the dance exhibition/class and more attention to social etiquette of the period was needed.  The second viewing shows how appropriate Rhys Velasquez choreographed this sequence.  I still agree that some of the social manners needed refinement.

The acting and singing overall varied, which highlighted those who had a more detailed characterisation.   One of the stand out performances included Don Winsor as Thomas Andrews the engineer who commanded our attention.  

Casey Withoos as Alice Beane desperately wanted to be in First Class while embarrassing her husband Edgar Beane played by Harley Morrison.  Both these fine actors worked well to create tension in their relationship, including their separation.

Henry Etches was played superbly by Christopher Southall.  He was respectful of his duties and his position to the end.  

Joel Granger as Harold Bride, the radio operator was sensational in his portrayal of the various dramatic levels of this role.

Paul Batey as the Captain E.J. Smith sang with his rich baritone voice though need more physical authority in his demeanour.  Sadly his uniform was ill fitting which is unforgivable by the costume department.

The three Kate's worked well together and provided lush female harmonies during "Ladies Maid".   They emphasised the hopes and dreams of new immigrants with sincerity and no hint of sycophancy. Their honesty highlighted the complex contemporary issues of boat people. 

Adam Di Martino as a Bellboy sang beautifully during "Wake Up, Wake Up" with Henry Etches played superbly by Christopher Southall.  His farewell hug with the captain left me with a lump in my throat at both performances highlighting the fragility of youth.

James Brown made a marked impression as William Murdoch.  His final scene was simple and theatrically strong with the use of the chairs to make a sound effect and the illusion was stylistically disturbing. His exit was into the lit aisle - as if meeting his maker.

Sam Bennet provided depth to his performance by visually and vocally differentiating his various characterisations.  His attention to characterisation detail is admirable.

Some of the characters were two dimensional for example Lady Caroline played by Greta Sherriff as she was too busy physically. This stood out against her lower class boyfriend who appeared more physically First Class with his stature and demeanour.  If the director chose this clashing of cultural backgrounds - I am afraid it did not work.  The Lady Caroline character needed more stillness.  The second viewing saw a more composed Lady Caroline.

Some of the posturing prior to beginning a song was a little contrived rather than characters physically flowing into songs.  There is a marked difference with those characters who needed to physically prepare a singer's stance rather than using their character's physicality.  This was less so on the second viewing.

There were very few props with the luggage, trunks and cases carried on and left upstage to create a sense of atmosphere.  A bell was used while a turned up suitcase was used for the Marconi morse code radio machine. .  All other props were mimed - of which some made sense but there needed more attention to detail when glasses or canapes were on one tray, and how glasses suddenly disappeared.  Some of the miming was clear and at other times bizarre and weird.  For example all of a sudden a glass would disappear and not be put down.  More attention was needed.

An odd choice was the use of four different angles for the radio/telegraph room.   Firstly, we were introduced to Harold Bride played by Joel Granger  using two trunks to create a desk en-face. Secondly he was sitting with the two trunks sideways to the audience covering his left ear.  Thirdly during the look-out scene Harold Bride was singing a duet downstage centre with Frederick Fleet played sensationally by Alex Thomson. Finally Harold Bride was sitting in the moat on stage right with a spotlight focused on him.  Maybe this choice was to show his position compared to where the captain was located.  But here he was lost amongst the action - albeit I am grateful for the spotlight as I was searching for him during this scene.  I would be interested to see the later three scenes using the same two trunks en-face perspective for clarity and consistency.

The second viewing emphasised the side on perspective highlighted the listing of the liner.

The rich anthem "Godspeed Titanic" is reprised during the finale with marvellous harmonies.  The curtain calls were simple and very enthusiastically cheered and applauded by the appreciative audience.   Sadly a few front row audience members could not wait for the cast to clear the aisle before they left.  Thankfully the second viewing had a more respectful audience.

I was disappointed that a young man in the centre of D Row turned on his mobile phone while the band were finishing the show in darkness.  This was not only a d lighting distraction but this young man missed the poignancy and accuracy of this immortalised band - playing to their death.

I wrote the following on my Facebook page immediately after the first viewing:


We saw "Titanic - the musical" and have waited since 1997 to see a production in Melbourne.  It is so good we are going again.  Already booked our tickets.  The staging is so simple and effective with the small orchestra placed in the centre of the raked stage .  The raked stage is haunting as we know how it all ends.  The way they use the chairs is like how they used them so creatively in "The Three Lives of Lucie Cabrol" by Theatre de Complicite.  Terrific singing, acting and staging.  A highlight for the 2016 theatre season.


Our second viewing:  "Titanic - The Musical" , Stage Art, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday July 23rd 2016 we had exactly the same seats.  Overall watching the musical again gave an opportunity to savour the good aspects of this production.  The particularly clever aspect was watching the use of the chairs in every scene that made more sense.  I think some reviewers need to see a show a second time in order to understand the depth of thought that went into the use of these chairs.  

Sadly during the long opening a man in F Row on the aisle kept playing with his mobile phone.  It was so distracting from my peripheral vision I jumped out of my seat at the end of the opening and signalled to him to turn it off.  The audience members gasped that I did this but I am sure were appreciative that he would no longer be flashing his large screen.

Another sad moment was the falling down the stairs of Casey Withoos who played Alice Beane opposite Harley Morrison as Edgar Beane.  They had just completed an emotionally charged scene with sincerity and poignancy.  Her fall down the stage right stairs added to the drama.  The stage manager called "Stop" and they checked on Casey Withoos to see that she was all right physically and emotionally to continue.  Casey Withoos was embarrassed and curtsied acknowledgement and thanks to the thunderous round of applause. This fall shows the potential danger that performers are subject to at every performance and the potential distractions of mobile phones flashing in the audience.  I do hope that Casey Withoos is physically and emotionally okay as she gave a terrific performance on both viewings.

Lady Caroline was played Greta Sherriff with less posturing physically and more naturally a First Class passenger travelling in Second Class.  Charles Clarke was played by Mathew Hyde with at least three different accents at this viewing.

The final scene with Isidor and Ida Straus was played more tenderly and affectionately by and Barry Mitchell and Amanda Stevenson.  This time they had more connection to their 40 year relationship and I had tears rolling down my eyes at their honest love and concern for each other.  Their final interaction with the stoic Etches was played reliably and consistently by the Christopher Southall. This young man is a force to be reckoned with and I look forward to seeing more of his artistry.


The loading of passengers onto the life boats was equally moving as the first viewing, but I winced to try to work out what was different this time.  I thought there was one man short on the life boat and I think J. Bruce Ismay played by Jon Sebastian missed this life boat as I recall thinking "Where is Ismay?"  My partner had the same thought when we debriefed after the show.

The couple's farewell with the baby was very moving.  This was played as well on both occasions by Alex Thompson and Rosabelle Elliott.  I remember the cries and despair of the cast - especially the wails of Molly Fisher  as Kate Murphy and the desperation of Alice Beane played by Casey Withoos. Very moving.

On this second viewing I grew to like the various locations of the radio room as when the ship was listing, the sideways perspective added to the visual tension of the Titanic sinking.

Paul Batey played the Captain E.J. Smith with more authority on this viewing.  The ill fitting uniform for the Captain took away from his authority.  Though Paul Batey is not physically accurate to the more rotund actual person he sang with great aplomb.

Overall I thought the second viewing provided an opportunity to see how robust the staging stood.  I do not think that James Cutler the director wasted a moment of directional opportunities given the designs.

The first viewing received a 9/10 while the second viewing received an 8.5/10 due to few inconsistent performances.

Note to Stage Art producers:  Please honour the discounted offer to "The Colour Purple' for all performances as the card had no restrictions on dates.  Next time please make sure you put restrictions on any advanced booking offers handed out by the ushers.




Monday, 8 August 2016

You're A Good Man Charlie Brown, Alex Theatre, Friday July 1st 2016

You're A Good Man Charlie Brown, Alex Theatre, Friday July 1st 2016

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

We saw "You're A Good Man Charlie Brown" based on the comic strip "Peanuts" by Charles Schulz. The script is by Clark Gesner and played at the Alex Theatre in St Kilda. This is such a good show for adults and families. If you a Peanuts fan - then you will understand the subtleties of the jokes with the various 3,4 8 or 12 frames from the comic strips.. It was so clever with simple and effective staging. The characterisations were honest versions of the cartoon strip. The singing and choreography paid homage to so many old movies and Broadway shows. This is a very slick production that should tour and play more than the school holidays. This is one of Melbourne's theatrical highlights for 2016.

Programme production credits are hard to read due to the small font size used on page 7 of the programme.  It would have been good to include the song list for audience members to recall the songs and sequences.

Each production number paid homage to vaudevilleBusby Berkeley films, and to various films including "The Jazz Singer" film.  The more you have read the comic strip and seen old movies the more you will understand the in jokes in this clever production.

This production was snappy and slick and is a credit to the direction of Gary Abrahams.  The casting was perfectly appropriate for every role.  Gary Abrahams' direction and vision was obvious in the synergy of all parts coming together - costumes, sets, lighting, choreography, music and performances.

Charlie Brown was played with sincerity by the ever competent Cameron MacDonald.  The kite scene with Charlie Brown was poignant and well staged.  Cameron MacDonald is a consistently well rounded performer who transforms each role with gusto and commitment and it is always a joy to see him in a new role.  His career is certainly worth while following.

Snoopy was brought to life by the incomparable skill of Luigi Lucente.  He played so many levels of Snoopy with his playfulness and his interaction with the birds, clouds and other characters.  Luigi Lucente brilliantly transformed the Snoopy character into the philosopher that Charles Schulz created.  The scene with Snoopy as the Red Baron was fun and well timed.  Luigi Lucente is an actor to watch closely in the future.

Adam Porter had the requisite desperation and anxiety of Linus.  His needy behaviour with his comfort blanket was added to by his sweaty persona.

Courtney Glass was Lucy the bully with her turned out stance, over-confident posturing and the raucous voice. "The Doctor Is In" sequence showcased the comedic talent of Courtney Glass.

Sarah Morrison played Sally without over powering her character. The opening Act Two duet with Schroeder is the memorable "My New Philosophy".  Her duet with Joshua Robson as Schroeder was played with warmth and musicality.  Joshua Robson singing "Beethoven Day" was a song of yearning and hope.  He played the piano with the composure and maturity of Schroeder.

The whole cast worked as an ensemble and supported each other through out.  They sang beautifully under the musical direction of Ben Kiley.

Dana Jolly's choreography is cartoon-esque and honours Charles Schulz's comic strip.  The use of the stairs in her choreography paid homage to Busby Berkeley,  old-time movies and Broadway musicals.  Dana Jolly brings out the best in the performers and ensures the audience has as much fun with the signature moves for each character.  From the "Opening/You're A Good Man Charlie Brown" to the finale "Happiness" Dana Jolly has captured the spirit and essence of the philosophical life of Charlie Brown and Snoopy.

The costume design by Chloe Greeves was perfect for each character with the clean lines of the comic strip.  The chunky soled shoes were just so perfect and respected Charles Schulz's drawings.  I look forward to more of her designs in the future.

The set design by Jacob Battista was so much fun and captured the essence of the one, two, three or four panels of Charles Schulz' comic strip.   The use of the screens reminded me of the Sydney Theatre Company's production of "Two Weeks With the Queen" and directed by Wayne Harrison. The use of the stairs that rolled out to create Snoopy's kennel or Schroeder's piano were simple, clever and fun.  These moving set pieces reminded me of "Falsettos" directed again by Wayne Harrison for  Sydney Theatre Company.  Jacob Battista is a set designer to watch in the future.

I used to read the cartoons as a child in the 1960's and the 1970's.  I used to watch the animated tv shows, and this production really nailed it.  They sounded like the characters.  They moved like the characters.  Not once did I disbelieve they were not the real characters.

The finale filled my heart with love, hope and fun.  I longed for the simpler times that Charles Schulz captured in his comic strips.

"You're A Good Man Charlie Brown"  received 8/10 and could easily be seen again!






Sunday, 7 August 2016

Trevor, Red Stitch, Wednesday August 3rd 2016

Trevor, Red Stitch, Wednesday August 3rd 2016

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Trevor" by Nick Jones is a play presented by Red Stitch.  This play did not receive the laughs that I was expecting and I can understand why.

"Trevor" is a very dated type of drawing room comedy with a supposed new twist having a man play a chimpanzee.  There is nothing new about this type of theatre where actors are talking in contrasting languages to be understood.

There is a lack of drama in the writing.  The actors do the best with quite a laboured script.  It is something that was presented so frequently at drama festivals around Australia in the 1970's and 1980's.  Scripts including Peter Shaffer's "Black Comedy" had more wit in them back then and still stand up as funny today. (Note the main joke in "Black Comedy" comes from the visual humour of the natural action occuring when the lights are off, compared to the characters struggling to see each other when the stage is lit up.)

"Albert" by Richard Harris is another play and where the actors talk in different languages to each other.  We as the audience can understand them talking in English but the three characters try to understand each other's foreign language.  I have seen each of these plays many times and are very funny even when performed by ordinary actors.

"Trevor"  also uses this device of a chimpanzee and owner communicating with each other.  Though we can hear them speaking in English they cannot understand each other.  Plus other characters including Morgan Fairchild try to communicate with Trevor the chimpanzee.  The playwright Nick Jones could learn from both Peter Shaffer and Richard Harris in constructing a drama that unfolds rather than envelopes an audience into tedium.  There are times when the dialogue becomes babble of words to give us the perspective of the listener struggling to understand.

Thankfully we witnessed the skill of a very actor Rory Kelly who physically transformed into Trevor the chimpanzee.  This physicality could have been utilised more in Act One as Act Two Rory Kelly' physicality was more pronounced.  Maybe it was a directorial decision for the audience to question if the chimpanzee was more human in Act One.

Andrea Swifte played Trevor's "mommy" Sandra with a fine balance between normalised behaviour and an eccentric woman.  I found her accent occasionally dropped out.  Her relationship and connection with Rory Kelly as Trevor created a semblance of truth and honesty.

The neighbour Ashley was played by Eva Seymour who was totally believable until the baby dropped out of a shelf.  Her objective to retrieve her baby was completely diminished by the lack of hysteria. Ask any mother how they would react if their baby fell off a shelf.  No normal person would put a baby on a shelf.  To add to her desperation the chimpanzee putting her baby on a shelf should have set off alarm bells.  If this was an accident that the baby fell from the shelf the cast needed to play their objectives to achieved their goals more honestly. The audience gasped in horror at our performance when the baby fell.  I think it would have been more realistic for Trevor to hide the baby under the lounge cushions  as he made this his base.  This is one reason why actors do improvisation work.

In one of the casts of "Blood Brothers" in London's West End the mother forgot her prop which was integral to a major scene.  How did she react?  She said something to the effect "I've got something for you.  A locket and I'll give it to you later".  I heard this story life from one of the brothers in this said production and this very named performance.

The other cast supported the production to varying degrees of success.

Dion Mills as Oliver the star chimpanzee in a white tuxedo had a consistent posturing and physicality.

Kevin Hofbauer played Pa and Jerry.  He played being uncomfortable in Trevor's company, during the questioning scene, with honesty. One of the funnier moments in the play was when Jerry was stabbed by the tranquilliser dart. Kevin Hofbauer's  gradual fall was terrifically timed for realism and comedy.

Angela Kennedy played Morgan Fairchild with moderate success.  She could have copied the pose of the cutout version on a number of occasions.  Her gown was a glamorous costume by Adrienne Chisholm.

The costumes worked better than others.

The haircut for the cop Jim played by Andrew Gilbert was totally wrong and his costume looked ridiculously cartoon-esque.  Both hair and costume detracted from his role.

Lighting by Daniel Anderson created mood and distinguished between the reality and Trevor's  memory of working with Morgan Fairchild.

The finale tag scene was unnecessary as it did not add anything to the story.  The exit of Ashley left us perplexed as to her baby's health situation.  We felt that the play could have been stronger had it ended with Sandra locked in the cage (slightly reminiscent of a "Twilight Zone" "Children's Zoo" episode at the zoo!).

Overall Denis Moore has done a reasonable job in directing "Trevor" with a very ordinary script.

The Stage Manager and Assistant Stage Manager, Jacinta Anderson and Jasmine Persse require special mention as I assume they re-set the props for each performance.  There is so much action with props in this play that the actors need confidence that they have been re-set accurately.   (It is the actor's responsibility to check their props before a show but they must work with the "Props" department.

I would recommend reading "Ape House" by Sara Gruen for more drama..

"Trevor" only obtained a 6/10.

Friday, 29 July 2016

Romeo and Juliet, Houston Ballet, State Theatre, July 6th 2016

Romeo and Juliet, Houston Ballet,  State Theatre, July 6th 2016


For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Romeo and Juliet" by the Houston Ballet was presented as part of The Australian Ballet Melbourne subscription season and I attended The State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne on July 6th 2016.

The programme cast sheet had the poorest of printing quality and was hard to read.  Other regular patrons agreed in the poor quality on the synopsis side.

This is a glorious sumptuous production, choreographed by Stanton Welch.  He has developed into a fine story teller by filling in so many missing gaps that other versions do not reveal.  Though this is at the expense of what seems a longer work.  Some of the scenes were necessary to tell the story, though the John Cranko version is more succinct without the detail of this production.

Choreographically there is a depth to the individual characters which is particularly noticeable in the Act 1, Scene 2: The Market.  Though visually stunning the focus was all over the place and other audience audience members were trying to differentiate between each of the characters.

Each character seemed to have signature movements and Michael Chekhov would be impressed as if
was using their own psychological gesture.  The nuns flitted across the stage on pointe - not your traditional pas de bourree, but more with a prim and proper religiously superior gait.  So many spring pointes were used en pointe to show excitement and an innocence of youth.

Many variations of echappes: saute, a terre and en pointe; were used by both sexes.  These echappes symbolically showed the separation of the two families. These simple movements created a subliminal tension.  I adored the masculinity of the men who defiantly asserted their strength with an echappe to a turned in second stance and fists on hips epaulment.

The ballet was hard to follow at times due to the lack of focus and busy background action.  There was just too much to take in and savour!  Even at the end of Act One I said to myself that I have to see this act again to absorb the depth of skill in choreographing so many characters..

"Romeo and Juliet" felt like a long ballet but was well worth the ride.  The thunderous applause and cheering was unheard of in my 35 years of going to see The Australian Ballet.

Act 1, Scene 5: The Ball was beautiful but the costume's colours merged into the backdrop.  It was so hard to see the port de bras above the shoulders against this background, and what made it worse was that the males and females alternated arms and became a blurring and rotating kaleidoscope.  I enjoyed the simplicity of the choreography during the famous musical phrases, and longed to be able to see the arms more clearly.  At times it reminded me of a televised triangle of the girls' and boys' audition combinations from "A Chorus Line".

The costumes and sets by Roberta Guidi di Bagno were stunningly military in their colour coding for each family unit.  The set folded into various configurations to create the alleys which turned into the ballroom and then into the famous balcony scene.

Act 2, Scene 2: The Chapel where the wedding of Romeo and Juliet occurs, was a magnificently simple set with a screen flown in with a large cut-out cross.  Light beamed from behind to create a lovely cross on the floor.  This lit cross created a boundary for family, and foreboding their doomed future - like their crucifixion and their tombstones.

The bearded men in blue were so snappy and crisp in their turns and batterie.  They received and deserved their acknowledgement by the audience who appreciated their sublime dancing.  I think it was Derek Dunn as Balthausar and Oliver Halkowich as Benvilio.  One of these fine young men displayed the neatest and most pure attitude en avant piroutte en dedans I have ever seen a male dancer perform. That. rarely performed pirouette, alone was worth my ticket.

It is so refreshing when the men out-shine the woman in such a traditional art form as ballet.  This is not to say the woman did not dance well, they danced beautifully.  To see so many fine male dancers was electrifying.

Jared Matthews as Mercutio had me gasping at his power and his controlled pirouettes.  His sensational double tours en'lair were breath-takingly clean, crisp and polished.  He too made my ticket worthwhile.  Then Jared Matthews finished off with more turns a terre.  Jared Matthews finished his turn with a solid, masculine and forth right fifth position.

Lord and Lady Capulet were danced respectively by Linnar Looris and Jessica Collado. They commanded your attention.  With the caring Nurse danced by Barbara Bears these three created emotional and electric charges of concern for Juliet.  Each had their signature moves to demonstrate their concerns, frustrations and love for Juliet.

Tybalt danced exquisitely by Christopher Coomer.  The fight sequences seemed natural and paid homage to the Errol Flynn movies without being hammy.

The sword fighting sequences with about twelve dancers were exciting and created tension.  There was no pussy footing to be seen. The rotating circles of sword fighters created a visual feast.

The miming was clear throughout.  It was a little patronising and over-explained in some sections, but added the depth of story telling that other versions of this ballet lack.  Normally the miming is referred to by our ballet audience group as "fluffing about", but here we had more action than other narrative ballets.

Although Act 1 seemed to not have as much dance, it was still spectacular to watch.

Finally to the two leads.  Romeo and Juliet were danced sublimely by Connor Walsh and Karina Gonzalez.  My ticket value had soared to scalper's heaven with these two dancers.  My heart was pounding with the love and angst they portrayed.  Having been trained by Anne Wooliams and Jan Stripling, I had learnt so much about John Cranko and his version of Romeo and Juliet .    Connor Walsh and Karina Gonzalez spoke every line of Shakespeare's iconic love story through dance.

Connor Walsh and Karina Gonzalez are names etched in my memory for their exquisite technique and musicality.  We were voyeurs as they created the forbidden soft ballet-porn with their erotic but not pornographic sexualisation of the love story.  We were allowed to see the development of their relationship in such a beautifully revealing way.  The simplicity of the kisses were natural and not the cliched dance moves.  They were passionate, romantic and eternal.

Connor Walsh never missed a beat with his pure technique and skill.  My heart leapt out of my chest with a few of his lifts.  A MICA unit nearly had to be called when he swept Karina Gonzalez across the stage and threw her around his neck and created seamless, flowing images that will stay with me for a lifetime.  Connor Walsh's pressage where he lifted Karina Gonzalez above his head with straight arms was as if he were a crane on a building site lifting her to the top of the Eureka Tower.  Breath taking!  It was the equivalent of the Alex Jesaulenko 1970 mark in Australian Rules Football - to be recalled for ever. That is why Melbourne audiences love and appreciate both their Australian Rules Football and the majesty of ballet. Speechless!  (Not really speechless - I cannot rave enough about these two iconic 21st Century stars!)

Karina Gonzalez showed the innocence of Juliet with her pure lines and her precise but not clinical technique.  Her footwork was so neat.  Both Connor Walsh and Karina Gonzalez's acting and interaction with other characters had a depth of understanding to their respective roles.

The Arts Centre Melbourne had many toilets being renovated and the queues to the Ladies Toilet were so long and many chose to venture upstairs to near the VIC Restaurant at the second interval. More advance signage should have given patrons notice that specific toilets were closed in advance. I only noticed one sign had been covered over.  The second interval was only 15 minutes and many ladies were still scurrying back from the long walk from the street level.

"Romeo and Juliet" by the Houston Ballet at The State Theatre, July 6th 2016 was a terrific night of dance and I could see this production again.

Overall I gave this production an 8/10.


Netherlands Dans Theater, State Theatre, Saturday June 23rd 2016


Netherlands Dans Theater, State Theatre, Saturday June 23rd 2016

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.


"Netherlands Dans Theater" performed a trio of works as an Australian exclusive at The State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne Saturday June 23rd 2016.

Our tickets were purchased about 7 months in advance upon their initial ticket release and they were snapped up fast.

We have seen "Netherlands Dans Theater" on about four or five occasions in the past, and seen each of their various programmes.  This time they did a trio of works "Sehnsucht" by Sol Leon and Paul Lightfoot, "Solo Echo" by Crystal Pite and "Stop-Motion" by Sol Leon and Paul Lightfoot,

"Sehnsucht" by Sol Leon and Paul Lightfoot reminded me of a contemporary version of Fred Astaire dancing in the room that turns around from "Royal Wedding".  Prince Credell is an athletic sleek and shiny black dancer who begins and ends this work.  He wears white loose trousers and shows off his magnificently masculine muscular physique.  Prince Credell dances sublimely and controls when he begins and ends the work.  He will not be rushed in framing this work.  If Prince Credell is the photographic negative then the two dancers Medhi Walenski and Parvaneh Scharafaliin the rotating box set are wearing the opposite colours. The male Medhi Walenski and Parvaneh Scharafali in the rotating box set are wearing the opposite colours to him with their white skin and black trousers.  The lady, Parvaneh Scharafali wears white tunic and is seated on the fixed-to-the-wall chair and leans on the equally fixed-to-the-wall table. 

This is a dance about yearning and Prince Credell introduces us to his yearning and desires.  It is voyeuristic at times as he poses while the others dance in the rotating cube.   Is he yearning for them or they for the outside world?  At times it has hints of regret and even razbliuto.  It is also like a threesome with no physical contact but intense emotional connections.

The dancing is sublime while the choreography at times is a bit clunky especially as the cube rotates.  There are pauses and shifts of weight to allow the dancers to get purchase and ready themselves for the next rotation.  I appreciate the editing in "Royal Wedding" is different to watching a life performance but felt these shifts were not as exciting and challenging our spacial perspectives.  

Saying this, I thought the use of the door and the windows was much more exciting than the cube turning.  This is where I felt we were challenged with our sense of spatial perception.

I could nearly scream at the cliched turned in a la'seconde attitude positions and yearned for more variety.  I was definitely feeling razbliuto about these positions.

The two side tabs revealed an ensemble of twelve dancers who rose from the wings.  This looked impressive at first but soon lost its appeal due to some of the sloppy ensemble timing.   When the ensemble were synchronised they looked terrific.  Note they were not doing a canon!

The ending was blurry as audience members scrambled for their mobile phones because the world was obviously going to end if they did not check them.  Prince Credell took his time to conclude the work as he remained crouched in his squat for many minutes until he finally rolled up through his spine and wandered very slowly off stage.  This reminded me of Lindsay Kemp's famous walk across the stage in "Flowers".  That was revolutionary and provocative back in 1875/76 and now comes across as indulgent.

"Solo Echo" by Crystal Pite was like being manipulated by others.  The soloist was like their plaything or toy as if the ensemble were the marionette operators.    I thought this was the most satisfying work in the programme.

The backdrop was a multi media of snow falling.

There were lots of suspended motions and off balances in the ensemble's ripple effects.  They demonstrated through dance the consequences of someone's actions and how it ripples through the lives of others.

My favourite section was when the six or seven dancers were in one line behind each other.  The main dancer moves upstage to each of dancer and tilts their head -first dancer right side, second left side and continued alternating as each dancer was thrust aside - quicker and quicker until the last dancer was caught.  This was a beautiful phrase that thankfully was not repeated.  There was a slight variation that hinted at this phrase but allowed us to savour the complexity of this work.

The lighting by Tom Visser created a flow and link to the choreography.


The final work was "Stop-Motion" by Sol Leon and Paul Lightfoot,  A large screen hung on down-stage right and showed a baroque type woman.  We saw close ups and various slow motion movement through out this piece.

Great extensions by the dancers showed power and their superb technique.

Five to six dancers brought a curtain forward and dumped white powder on the stage and returned the curtain upstage.  Usually this curtain device is shown to reveal a new dancer or create waves, and the dumping of the flour like powder was a surprise.  Though in hindsight the photos in the programme alerted us to some dancers getting very earthy with the powder.  The use of sand and powder was more successful in the co-production by The Australian Ballet and Bangarra Dance Theatre "Rites" based on "The Rite of Spring" where they used the coloured sands of the earth to paint their bodies ritualistically.  In "Stop-Motion" it seemed like a theatrical trick.

A bird flew off into the distance on the backdrop.  The dancers pulled back the black backdrop to create vaulted columns.  The side tabs rolled forward and were raised into the flies.  The lights above were exposed and lowered and reminded me of the finale of  the 2014 Broadway Tony Award winning revival "Pippin".  

The final pose had the man and woman interlocked reaching forward in opposite directions and created a semblance of hope after the heaviness of the theme of farewell and transformation.  The finale pose allowed the lightness of renewal.

Overall the dancing was sublime while the choreography was very repetitive at times.

Overall a 7/10.

Double Indemnity, MTC, Playhouse Theatre, Wednesday June 29th 2016

Double Indemnity, MTC, Playhouse Theatre, Wednesday June 29th 2016



"Double Indemnity" written by Tom Holloway and adapted from the book by James M Cain was presented by the Melbourne Theatre Company at the Playhouse Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne on Wednesday June 29th 2016.

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Double Indemnity"  is a great night of entertainment and should tour internationally with its superbly clever three revolving stages that create so many wonderful scenes.  The best part of the scenery is that it lives and is as much an actor as the rest of the cast.  This revolving set also allows for the most incredible transitions between places and actors by having one actor starting a scene before the next ends.  I thought this device was used intelligently and flowed beautifully to seamlessly move us into a new scene, whilst maintaining tension from the previous scene.

The acting by the cast paid homage to the film-noir genre without being hammy or over-acted.  Though some of the accents did drop at times and the intonation was more Australian rather than the driven American intonation.

The ending was a bit of a disappointment but after research was more in keeping with the non-specific ending of the book.  In hindsight our discussion as per many others leaving the theatre outlined the many possible endings within the context shown.

Costumes were magnificently rich and created the genre of "how was it done?" or "how did they or will they get away with the murder?"

Overall this production deserved a 8/10.

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

Swan Lake, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Wednesday June 8th 2016

Swan Lake, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Wednesday June 8th 2016



For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Swan Lake" choreographed by Stephen Baynes is usually a tight cohesive ballet.  This return season and the second night by The Australian Ballet, State Theatre on Wednesday June 8th 2016 should be re-titled "Swan Dive".

Let me first highlight and congratulate the sublime partnership of Kevin Jackson and Leanne Strojmenov.  Their partnership saved the evening for me.  Their chemistry and artistry was on fire with electricity to the back row of the State Theatre.

Now I have seen at least 40 live performances and many versions of Swan Lake by both The Australian Ballet and many international dance companies and I know the difference between a solid performance and otherwise.  Heaven help me with the number of versions I have seen on television, cable tv, or on video or dvd.

Act One saw a sloppy corps de ballet.  To top off Act One I saw one of the worst pas de trois I have seen in a ballet with sloppy footwork, individual timing and near falls.

The man was not supporting his turns and stumbled on about four occasions.

The corps de ballet were out of time and the lines were wonky or not straight.  The pas de deux during the corps de ballet main dances highlighted the hand to hand exchange between the male and female dancer as sloppy and laboured.

I repeat that Kevin Jackson and Leanne Strojmenov were great and may not have been aware how they saved this performance.

The Act Two white scene left me uninspired.  The corps de ballet seemed disengaged.  Take note the interview with Eloise Fryer on page 27 of the programme may explain why. I would expect that the swans would be holding their poses to create a frame and an atmosphere.  Not according to Eloise Fryer who explains that during these 15 minutes of holding a pose she will either look at the orchestra or will run over choreography through her head.  Well used this later technique during "Giselle"!  I am so not impressed that the concentration levels have resorted to this!  Maybe we could supply the corps de ballet with tablets and mobile phones to catch up on their social media obligations!

Overall this "Swan Lake" was more like a "swan dive"!