Wednesday, 28 June 2017

The Sleeping Beauty, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Wednesday June 21st 2017

The Sleeping Beauty, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Wednesday June 21st 2017

"The Sleeping Beauty" - A production by David McAllister was presented by The Australian Ballet, at the State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne on Wednesday June 21st 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

In a word this performance was AWFUL!

I have seen this new version of "The Sleeping Beauty" by David McAllister when it was first presented and still think it is the best version of this story ballet.  Sadly the cast were under-rehearsed, tired and walking through their performances.

This was the worst performance by The Australian Ballet I have ever seen.

The fairies in Act One all had faults in their solos.  I will not be writing names as everyone can have a bad day.  One dancer had incomplete extensions, another floppy feet, an awkward pas de chat that was squashed and nearly crashed into a couple on stage left.  The costumes looked pretty!

The wrist lines were wrong for about four females during the garland waltz whilst wearing the blue and lemon costumes.

The patterns and lines were messy at times.

Act One when the baby is carried on needs refinement.  It looked as if a doll was being thrown around in a very pedestrian fashion.  There was no sense of fragility in baby handling skills by all who held the baby.

The crib entrance is still clunky and should be on a truck or wheels, or on one side of the stage.

During Act Two we witnessed a pointe shoe coming undone.  This was elegantly attended to as the young lady gracefully re-tied her shoe whilst sitting on her partner's knee.  This was a highlight and over rated the quality of the dancing!  Yes - it out performed the majority of the dancing.

The Usher in the stalls (stage left region) was monitoring our dreaded woman who persists on turning her phone during every ballet performance.  Congratulations to this Arts Centre Melbourne  usher for her diligence as the light from the phone is so distracting.

Some of the miming needs refining and reworking.  There is an over use of the port de bras to second gesture that is used to mean so many different things.  There could be more clarity with the gestures.

The Act Three Bluebird pas de deux had an incomplete presage lift.  I can understand this is a difficult lift and timing is paramount to its success.  Sadly this pas de deux looked under rehearsed.  Again, these usually sensational dancers had an off night.  Do not whip yourselves.  Yes I am calling what I saw - but you are both sensational dancers and I look forward to your next performance.  You redeem yourself by getting back on your feet.

Amy Harris as Princess Aurora with Andrew Killian as Prince Desire danced adequately but were not on fire. Amy Harris  did not look secure in her balances.  One of her pirouettes had to be completed as she got stuck facing her partner Andrew Killian.  His solo was too slow and laboured, that made him so grounded rather than elevated.  This fine duo was good but not their usual brilliance.  Again do not whip yourselves as I think Carabose had cursed this performance.

In Act Three one of the female guests fainted on stage and about three cast carried her off stage right. This created a buzz on stage where the concentration levels peaked.  Sadly this young lady's misfortune created the best part of the ballet as the corps de ballet lifted their game with concentration, alertness and team work.

I was so impressed with this section as a couple on stage left from the corps de ballet left the stage to compensate for even patterns.  Watching the corps de ballet chat among themselves to reconfigure and adjust positions was priceless.  I am in awe of this group of dancers who did not allow this to destroy the show.  BRAVO to you all for such camaraderie.  Yes the final circle was incomplete - but who cares when you had the dancers really trying the hardest to make this scene work.

I think the whole night was a "Comedy of Errors" and each error compounded the next.

The Australian Ballet, at the State Theatre, on Wednesday June 21st 2017

In summary the dancing was ordinary, 

Overall I gave this performance a 6.5/10.

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Away, Co-production with Sydney Theatre Company and Malthouse Theatre, Merlyn Theatre, Wednesday May 17th 2017

"Away", Co-production with Sydney Theatre Company and Malthouse Theatre, Merlyn Theatre, Wednesday May 17th 2017

"Away", Co-production with The Sydney Theatre Company and Malthouse Theatre, Merlyn Theatre, Wednesday May 17th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

It is June 28th 2017 as I am editing my memories and review:  I am still savouring seeing "Away" by Michael Gow, which is a co-production between The Sydney Theatre Company and Malthouse Theatre.  We saw a performance at the Merlyn Theatre on Wednesday May 17th 2017.  We had seen a production in about 1990 and this play not only survives with time, but actually is better with time.

Design by Dale Ferguson is brilliant.  I had to draw about six images when I got home from the theatre to savour his designs.  Here is a summary of what I experienced: Arriving to take our seats, the stage is an open wooden floor with some exposed wooden poles, There is a cutaway that looks like a coffin, that later becomes a walkway and entrance.  There is a black screen hanging down stage that creates the effect of a letter-box television screen.  The function of this black screen hides one of its functions. I noticed some coils or springs above the wooden beams and did not take much notice as were waiting for the show to begin.  Later, these coils or springs or ropes would create an iconic moment in the play.

The setting is vast and emphasises the physically distance from each character.  At times it reminded me of the original staging of "The Light In The Piazza" at New York's Lincoln Centre's Vivian Beaumont Theater.

A wardrobe is used on multiple occasions for three different scenes.  This wardrobe is also stripped to become a frame and a doorway.  This wardrobe is reminiscent of "The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe" as it is a portal to our inner emotions and thoughts.

Dale Ferguson allows the cast to create a small stage that pays homage to the Hamlet episode from "Gilligan's Island".  He has designed a temporary stage that is made of drums, poles, suitcases and curtains.  Not only does this image fit with the "Gilligan's Island" Shakespeare episode but also to "The Tempest" as this portable stage creates a ship wreck and other island images.

The most magical moment is the transformation scene where the set is lifted upward by pulleys or ropes or springs.  Underneath the wooden stage is a white canvas wall, white floor and the open doorway that looks like a coffin.  This doorway is black and was the open cutaway walkway before the transformation.  When light pours through this doorway it sheds hope for the future.  We are seeing life from a different perspective.  This is pure magical design.

The donkey images are Shakespearean from "A Midsummer Night's Dream" which opens "Away". These donkey images appear throughout "Away" in a dreamlike ethereal way.

Dale Ferguson captured the late 1960's with the gold curtain that paid homage to "Laugh In".  The costumes included the daggy swimwear of the period, which got the requisite laugh.

Dale Ferguson's head will be exploding with my superlatives.  His design shows us so many aspects of life as it replicates the iceberg theory: where all of the effort or work is unseen.  Many secrets and emotions are hidden under the surface and suppressed by many of the characters with the main wooden flooring set.  The characters reveal their suppressed emotions and back-stories, as if below the iceberg, after the main set change/transition.

The one design flaw was Tom's schoolbag that was not 1968 vintage and too modern for the scenes. The school bags used are available in many second hand shops, in fact I have two variations in my garage.

Dale Ferguson has created one of the most memorable stage designs that resonates for weeks after seeing the production.  The simplicity of the design is complex in the depth of images and multiple functions he has created.

The play was well acted but the multiple parts by the actors was confusing at times.  Was that the same character or a different character?  The 1990 programme had each character named against the actor playing the multiple roles, while in this production only two actors had this succinct notation. The old programme allowed the audience to understand that the actors would be playing multiple roles.

The direction by Matthew Lutton maximised the use of pauses for both dramatic and comedic effect.  His direction, with some of the iconic moments from 1967/1968, took me back to my childhood: - with the "powder" (Bex) moment, the Dame Patti Menzies moment, the school shoes for Christmas presents and the Dame Zara Bate on the beach moment.  Matthew Lutton has created so accurately this era throughout the use of atmospheres with his fine cast.

The choreography by Stephanie Lake in conjunction with Dale Ferguson's design captured the late 1960's as the cast thrust their legs through the gold curtain that paid homage to "Laugh In".  It was as if I was watching Goldie Hawn, Ruth Buzzi, Jo Anne Worley, Lily Tomlin and Chelsea Brown doing their go-go-dancing opening routines.

Stephanie Lake has the cast traipse around the stage in formation as if a platoon of soldiers in the Vietnam jungle war zone, or the urban jungle of life:  with Coral trying to understand the meaning of life and Gwen trying "to keep up with the Jones".

Stephanie Lake creates sequences that segue between scenes and allow us to appreciate the fragility of life:  Are we living, is this a dream or a nightmare?  It is with hindsight that I have savoured these segues that worm through the play as if a thematic thread to help bind the character's stories.

"Away" is sheer brilliance with every character being away from something.  The young characters seem to be more in touch with their reality, and away from the adults.  The adults seem to be away with the fairies or off with the pixies.

The characters can be away emotionally or physically distanced from another character.  The characters vary in being away by distress, detachment or denial. Some characters can be physically separated or away from another character by age, respect, sexual frigidity, sexual deprivation or the fear of being stalked.

The new Australians Vic (Julia Davis), Harry (Wadih Dona) and their son Tom (Liam Nunan) can be culturally away as they try to fit into their new country.

Vic, Harry and their son Tom are also made to feel away or unwelcome by the inhospitable Gwen played brilliantly by Heather Mitchell.  This tight family unit tries to keep together physically, emotionally and spiritually knowing that bad news was imminent with their son's health.  The family showed strength in keeping hope alive and the threat of Tom's impending death away.  Here, Vic and Harry are fully aware of their son's illness and keep him close to their hearts.  They do not want him to go away.

The principal, Roy played by Glenn Hazeldine had to keep moving away to start afresh as his wife Coral played superbly by Natasha Herbert, was away with the fairies.  Roy had to move jobs and towns in order to survive and appear connected.  The more he kept trying to be connected the more away Coral becomes.  By Roy trying to bring Coral back to reality created tensions and awkward moments that could cross the line into stalking.  By trying to get close to newlywed Rick (a dual role played by Liam Nunan) Coral created more distance.  Rick reminded Coral of her son who was killed in Vietnam.  Again the theme of away is so repeated in so many different ways.

All of the different versions of being away are emphasised by Matthew Lutton's superb direction.  He gets us thinking "where are we away from?" or "who are we away from?" or "Are we away from our own true self?" or "Are we being present with ourselves or others to obtain inner peace?"

The same wardrobe is used as the three families prepare and pack for a holiday.  In the first of the packing scenes, Tom is left stage right observing the action of Roy and Coral packing.  Is Tom now a ghost or an angel?  Is Tom foretelling his future?   It is as if Tom both represents Roy and Coral's dead son looking over them and protecting them, and looking at his fate of what his parents will endure when he dies.

Having Tom observe this action is a magical moment and is the first time this device is used in the direction of the play.  By doing so, Matthew Lutton has cemented a contract with the audience that will be repeated throughout the play: the role of observing from away: "Away" in time, distance thoughts or memory.  Tom is haunting us.  But he could also be guiding and protecting us to NOT be away - but to be connected.

The donkey headed (Bottom) characters reappear as if from a nightmare from "A Midsummer Night's Dream".  This image haunts us and represents memories of both the forest and an uplifting moment of perpetual childhood paying homage to "Peter Pan".  This image is miraculous as it increases the distance between hope and reality for Tom's health plight.

The donkey parade reappearing represents the war zone of every day living for many characters, but in particular Coral's torment.  This donkey parade represents the jungles of Vietnam both a distant war zone physically and in Coral's imagination.  Coral can only know what the Vietnam jungle looked like from the television as the Vietnam war was the first war to be shown nightly on the news (compared to the News Reels at the cinema during World War 2).  This jungle does not make sense at first,  and it is as if we are challenged to also to be away from somewhere, someone or something.

Gwen (Heather Mitchell) played the neurotic wife brilliantly.  She played the hysterical and ridiculous woman who has a lonely, monotonous and empty life.  Gwen was also channeling the Betty Draper character from "Mad Men",

Gwen's husband, Jim was played superbly by Marco Chiappi,  would float along.  Jim appeared to be a weak character and in fact showed us his strength by supporting his wife's issues.  Marco Chiappi's Jim provided one of the funnest moments with his throw-away line about finding his keys after the brilliant hysteria of Heather Mitchell's Gwen.

Heather Mitchell as Gwen, did not draw breath in her rapid fire delivery which accentuated the haunting Vietnam war images for Coral and Roy.  Gwen was trying to "keep up with the Jones" and in doing so created so much inner turmoil and distancing herself from others.  She was keeping the new Australian family away by her unwelcoming attitude and her double standards.

Coral played brilliantly by Natasha Herbert is questioning the meaning of  life and death.  She vacillates between reality, medicated reality and fantasy.  She plays the philosopher and questions the merit and worth of struggling to improve ourselves.  Coral traipsing around the stage had a dual image as if a platoon of soldiers in the jungle searching for answers to how her son died in the Vietnam war, and the urban jungle of survival.

Roy, Coral's husband, was played wonderfully by Glenn Hazeldine  in suppressing the loss of his son. Roy tries to keep strong for his wife, Coral.  Roy confronts Coral with an explosion of pent up emotions as if another Vietnam war image of a grenade waiting to explode and injure the prey-in-waiting.  However, Roy's revelation is cathartic and typical of the 1960's when men did not show their emotions so readily as today. Roy confronted his demons within himself and with his wife.  Roy is at the end of his tether and is seeking a way to allow their relationship to move forward, away from their grief.

Vic, played wonderfully by Julia Davis reminds us that life is a cycle and to enjoy what time we have together as a family. Vic embraces the fragility and preciousness of life.  Vic demonstrates acceptance psychological theory as a way of moving forward and as a coping mechanism. Julia Davis's Vic is not being ruthless but highlights the gratitude of her life with her family and her new adopted home, away from her support back in the United Kingdom.  She is such an understated character that teaches us so much about resolve, strength and resilience.

Harry was played admirably by Wadih Dona with warmth and sincerity.  He supported his wife Vic and they worked well together as a believable family unit with their son, Tom. This honest connection and relationship between the three actors as a family, made it more gut wrenching when this family unit was revealing and living the secret of their ill son.

The three actors playing Vic, Harry and Tom created an honest connection and relationship as a family unit, making it more gut wrenching when they revealed their ill son's impending fate.

My only concern was that Wadih Dona's accent took a scene to develop, rather than instantly recognising a British accent upon his first line and entrance.

Masks of pain are shown through out the production: both the physical donkey mask and the cover-up facade to "grin and bear it" to hide their individual torment.  Each character is hiding something, as if a mask of pain.  This image is highlighted as the characters wear the donkey or Bottom mask to hide their faces.  This image is to cover the shame they feel about their pain, and is another example of showing physical distance and being "away" from their pain.  This donkey mask is used as if hiding in the jungle - Vietnam or urban jungles, in reality or in their nightmares.  The mask is also used as a device to voyeuristic-ally watch others like a fly on the wall in different scenes.  The observing device is mainly performed by Tom as if he is an angel overlooking events of his life.

Tom was giving his parents permission to move on during the final "amateur night" with a set that looked as if it was from "Gilligan's Island".

The final "amateur night" was spoiled by a young lady in the audience texting during this very emotional scene.  She did not try to hide her phone but held it up vigorously and rudely texting with the light distracting many around her.

The final school scene was well staged as Tom was no longer at school.  The final speech by Naomi Rukavina as Meg was delivered with sincerity and honesty and her simple looking away allowed us into her realisation that Tom had now died.  A brilliant version of the ending that captured the soul and essence of being away physically but also being closer than ever to Tom emotionally and spiritually.

In the 1990 version of "Away" Tom said the final speech.  I preferred Matthew Lutton's version as it emphasised the impact of someone dying or going away has on young friends.

Matthew Lutton has captured the essence of grief, during 1967/68 and has presented us with a wonderful meditation on mortality and the fragility of life.

"Away" captures the ebb and flow of life and all of the challenges we are faced.

It was such a coincidence as this day was exactly one hundred days since I had lost my mother who was very supportive of me.  I have suffered incredible grief during my life and my mother taught me to be resilient.  Watching my parents lose a child was gut wrenching.  To lose two was unbearable.   My mother did not deny the life and death cycle as she had lost her mother when she was six year's old in 1933.  My mother prepared all of my siblings with the inevitability of death.   My mother's famous phrase "that's life" was so aptly presented in "Away" and her spirit was ever present.  It was a healing for me to see this wonderful play on such a milestone day as this wonderful cast honoured and respected those who have died and those who have been left behind.

I do not write lightly about this wonderful cast of "Away".  I am still relishing in the beauty of life on June 28th 2017  as I try to finish my review.  (I do not want to finish this as I am relishing my memories).

Thank you to the  The Sydney Theatre Company and Malthouse TheatreMerlyn Theatr for such a moving production of "Away"that will linger in my heart and memories for many years to come.

I gave this production of "Away" an 8.5/10.  My partner also gave it an 8.5/10.

Facebook post:


I wrote the following on my Facebook page:  "AWAY" by Michael Gow:  The Malthouse Theatre and Sydney Theatre Company have produced a sensational version of Michael Gow's play "AWAY".  I have seen it before and for those who grew up in the 1960s many themes will resonate.  I could easily see this production again.  There is a great interview with Michael Gow that gives insights into the play on the ABC.  So saddened he has now passed on - but wow what a legacy he has left behind with such a masterpiece of writing. Congratulations to the cast and crew.  2017-05-18


Spoiler alert:  The transformation scene is reminiscent of "Titanic- the musical" with the lining sinking, "Sunset Boulevard - the musical" with the set flying in, and "An Inspector Calls" where the whole set collapses.  This scenery change is spectacular in execution and comes as such a wonderful surprise that supports the story by transporting us to the clinical white beach, which can be heaven or hell to some people.  This image of the white set underneath also creates the image of the underworld of hell or fantasy.  Brilliant, sheer brilliance as the design emotionally supports the play.  I have seen so much theater where the design is a marketing tool, here the design is another element which is subtle but integral to the action.

Friday, 23 June 2017

21 Chump St & Ordinary Days, Pursued by Bears, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday June 17th 2017

21 Chump St & Ordinary Days, Pursued by Bears, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday June 17th 2017

"21 Chump St" & "Ordinary Days" was presented by Pursued by Bears at Chapel Off Chapel, on Saturday June 17th 2017.

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

No attendant was selling programmes at the door to the theatre.  A jar sat next to the display of programmes and this is not responsible from a business and security perspective, and a poor show in welcoming patrons and customer service.

The programme lacked the song list.  Musical theatre fans relish being able to recall a specific song with a singer or a scene, rather than having to wade through the internet or a record collection to locate the name of a song.  The $5.00 price tag is affordable and of a much better quality than some other production companies.  However, where are Pursued by Bears's contact details in the programme?

An attendant should been monitoring patrons as they entered the theatre.  The curtain should have been pulled back for a safer entry for patrons.

No pre show announcement was made.  Pursued By Bears could invent creative ways to remind audience members to turn off their phones and no texting, photographs and recording etc.  This was another missed opportunity to prepare audience members for a special event rather than patrons idling sitting and waiting for the show to begin, and creating unnecessary distractions.

"21 Chump St" by Lin-Manuel Miranda tells a story from an episode of "This American Life" succinctly in fourteen minutes.

Byron Bache directed, with Clary Riven assisting, the three main characters with clear goals and intentions,  Both the direction and setting provided clear distinctions between most locations with the use of chairs, a television monitor and three cameras.   The sight lines were good from up the back as they did not play too close to the front row.  This is sadly a rarity in this theatre where too many productions get lost for playing too close to the front row of The Loft at Chapel Off Chapel.

Byron Bache's direction, was supported by the clean and simple Production Design by the capable and creative Sarah Tulloch.  Her designs reminds me of John Truscott's ability to create magic on a tight budget,  I am impressed with this young designer and enjoy her work.  It will be interesting to see how she develops with larger budgets.

The Lighting Design by Jason Crick was slicker than other productions, without some of the technical difficulties that I have seen in the The Loft.    Jason Crick's lighting designs provided a seamless distinction between locations.  The scenes behind the gauze curtain gave both a voyeuristic quality of intrusion to the journalist's interview, and the graininess of a television screen.

Lauren Edwards as the Narrator drew us into this short musical from her opening delivery to camera.

Olivia Charalambous was believable as Naomi, the undercover cop, who sang as reliably and beautifully as in other shows which she has performed.  She has an ability to engage with other performers to command our attention.  Olivia Charalambous created a clean switch between her school girl personae and the matter-of-fact and "part of my job" as cop when interviewed.

Jake Fehily as Justin Leboy was the gob-smacked youth who created an honest realism to his infatuation with Naomi.  His final singing was a bit off, but more importantly he transported me to his location with his emotional connection to a truth and an understanding of the consequences of his actions.

The scene with the cousins/druggies wearing beanies transitioned into the the school room scene. The police-woman played by Nicola Bowman should have had a simple hat or sunglasses to differentiate her character at this point.  Her physical actions as the cop did not define an authoritarian figure from her student characterisation. This scene was messy and lacked focus, and did not transform into the classroom scene effectively.

The cast sang well, though some diction was a bit dodgy at times.  The cast was backed up by an ensemble of Nicola Bowman, Kai Mann-Robertson and Stephanie Wood.

Musical direction by Caleb Garfinkel provided terrific support for the cast and filled The Loft with a wonderfully rich sound from a small band.

While watching "21 Chump St", with the use of the cameras and television screen, I realised that this capable company should consider doing "Nobody Loves You".  They could rework the ending to allow the for audience participation in the vote, which was sadly lacking in Second Stage's production in July 2013.  (Of course the outcome of "Nobody Loves You" is known - but with the audience participation it would be more engaging, and, could come across as either a true outcome or a rigged outcome.  This competent company could rework this work to cater for the "Big Brother" and reality show audiences.)

The story is succinct and compelling, though a little didactic.

My partner and I both gave Pursued by Bears' production of "21 Chump St"  a 6.5/10.

"Ordinary Days" was presented by Pursued by Bears  at Chapel Off Chapel, on Saturday June 17th 2017.

No pre show announcement was made.

Tyran Parke directed this fabulous cast of "Ordinary Days".   The four terrific performers were well cast for "Ordinary Days"  as each played definite choices that worked to create known New York archetypes. They transported me to New York locations that I know well.

With Music and Lyric by Adam Gwon, the score can be a bit monotonous until the final two songs providing a rich and uplifting ending.

The Production Intern, Kyra Von Steigler used sheer curtains to create a depth to the staging.  Four simple black set pieces made a New York skyline that turned into various other set pieces: including chairs or  a bed.  The Freedom Tower set piece was reconfigured with a simple door to become a closet and a telephone booth, while below was a storage cupboard.  This was simple and effective design.

Sadly, the sight lines were not good as they played many scenes too close to the front row.  It was very much like attending the NGV and trying to avoid the selfies and the heads of viewers.  I wonder how many directors consider the view from the seats further back with a full audience.  I have stated this in other reviews and it staggers me that playing so far down-stage in this small theatre continues.

Lighting Design by Jason Crick created various moods of New York:  with the opening back-lit skyline to an impressionist palette that supported the four characters visiting the  Metropolitan Museum of Art.  The simple lighting design also allowed for the height of an apartment building that reminded me of a simpler version of one lighting plot from "Spiderman - the Musical" (from the 17th August 2011 version!!).  The strewn pamphlets towards the end fluttering down also created a sense of height.

"Ordinary Days" reminded me in part of "On The Town" with the visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Art:  when Deb played by Nicola Bowman was determined to meet Warren and retrieve her notebook.  Deb doing her circuit of the Met trying to find her meeting point with Warren, reminded me of, and paid homage to, Erronius doing the circuit three times from "A Funny Thing That Happened On The Way To The Forum".  Deb's frustration and anxiety rose to humorous recognition for those what have been lost in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Joel Granger is a reliable and charismatic performer in the role of quirky Warren from his opening soliciting pamphlets scene.  He sang beautifully but was a bit flat in one of the later songs.  Joel Granger reminds me of the lead character from "Bradley Cole" that played the 2013 New York Fringe.  Joel Granger would make a wonderful Evan Hansen from "Dear Evan Hansen".  I hope this fine young performer is given the opportunity to show his capability.

Nicola Bowman was sensational as Deb with her desperation to recover her notes.  She mainly sang well and sadly was flat in a later number.  Yes, I was disappointed by this, but I was more impressed with her strong choices for her character.  Playing opposite Joel Granger they created some terrific moments of awkwardness and tension.  Warren overstepped Deb's physical boundaries innocently adding to the humour.

Joel Granger as Warren helped open up Deb's eyes to the world and to herself.  We saw a lovely realisation and transformation in Deb as Warren gradually showed her how to see possibilities.

Mathew Hamilton played Jason and sang beautifully.  He has a gentle command with his stillness that demanded we listen to his story.

Brittanie Shipway as Claire has a sensational voice with a rich tone.  Claire invited us to witness her inner thoughts and emotions and realisations: ranging from detached to trapped.  Clarie's warmth to Jason grew to coldness that created tension from early on.  Jason was intruding upon her space and memories. Remember this young lady's name - Brittanie Shipway - for her final solo was sensational.  Repeat - sensational as it was full of drama, despair, realisation and hope.

The small band played well under the musical direction of Stephanie Lewendon-Loew, though the piano dominated and disturbed the balance.

I would have been content had the show finished with the final throwing away of the pamphlets from up high.  The final scene  seemed like a coda to provide a neat and tidy conclusion.  Both my partner and I were more satisfied with the possibility rather than the proposal and the revelation of the Jason and Claire finding a pamphlet.

The exit by the audience was a lovely touch as audience members were able to select one of the strewn coloured pamphlets from the stage.  This simple souvenir is your personal reminder of the show and was a great idea,

During the show, two audience members had to attend to their phones and made hasty exits from the theatre and walked straight across the stage.  It was so New York as they drove their way through the stage to reach the exit!  One of the cast members had to restrain their shock.  If there is an emergency - do not attend!  I say this one young lady was on her phone before the show and right up until the show began.  It was very distracting and sometimes a emergency means giving up going to the theatre.

I love Pursued by Bears for their dedication to musical theatre and providing young performers with opportunities, and fans with rarely performed works.

I would love to see this fine company tackle the off-Broadway production of "Death Takes A Holiday" from the Roundabout Theatre.

If you missed out on these two fine productions - tough titties.  You will not want to miss their next show.  They are such a great company.

The Alex Theatre in St Kilda should be enticing this company to their venue as they have much better sight lines.

My partner gave Pursued by Bears  production of "Ordinary Days" an 8/10 while I gave it a 7.5/10.

Thursday, 8 June 2017

Nutcracker - The Story of Clara, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Wednesday June 7th 2017

Nutcracker - The Story of Clara, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Wednesday June 7th 2017

"Nutcracker - The Story of Clara" choreographed by Graeme Murphy was presented by The Australian Ballet at the State Theatre, Arts Centre,  Melbourne on Wednesday June 7th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Nutcracker - The Story of Clara" choreographed by Graeme Murphy is my favourite version of this beautiful Christmas story.  This is the fourth time I have seen this ballet presented by The Australian Ballet at the State Theatre, Arts Centre in  Melbourne.

In summary the dancing was sublime but the scene changes in Act Two were clunky and created unnecessary pauses and disrupted the flow.  So therefore my overall rating dropped from what should have been a minimum 9/10 experience.

On a more positive note the re-interpretation of the concept by Graeme Murphy and Kristian Fredrikson stands the test of time: being 25 years since "Nutcracker - The Story of Clara" was first realised.  The more I see this ballet the more depth I see in Graeme Murphy's choreography.  For the first time I realised the formation of the eighteen snowflakes at the end of Act One created the capital letter N - for Nutrcracker.  Magical stuff.

I have tears in my eyes whenever I tell people about this version of "Nutcracker - The Story of Clara" as it tells the back-story of the origins of The Australian Ballet.

I adore the pre-show reveal of the children playing in the Australian backyard under the iconic Hills Hoist clothes-line.

Chrissa Keramidas danced the role of Clara, the Elder with grace and assurance.  She showed us the wealth of her international experience and wisdom in her impressive performance.  Welcome home Chrissa Keramidas to the Australian stage and we hope to see more of your charisma.

Clara, the Child was danced beautifully by Jessica Stratton-Smith.

Amy Harris danced the role of Clara, the Ballerina exquisitely.

The three Clara's danced together in short moments of recognition creating poignant vignettes.

Yes Colin Peasley knocked over one of the Babushka dolls and quickly picked it up and put it back in its position.  He replaced this doll so naturally so as not to disrupt the line of dolls created by the group of Russian Emigre Friends.  To break the perfect line would be to be disrespectful to their disciplined ballet training.  By ensuring he contributes, to create the beautiful straight line of dolls, added a little bit of realistic tension to their relationships.  I cannot remember this moment from previous viewings but it should be kept in.

The dropped bread in the picnic scene always brings gasps from the audience.  This highlights the tension of the Russian class structure and is a simple device to provide so much background information and depth to the story.

I cannot rave enough about the quality of the dancing in "Nutcracker - The Story of Clara".   The young children were flawless and exciting to watch.

Andrew Killian as the Doctor sat for an extended period of time before making the transformation to the Beloved Officer.  Clara, the Ballerina danced by Amy Harris was breathtaking.  The first entrance together down the stairs to Andrew Killian lifting her onto his shoulder was cautious and with foundation.  I am in awe at the trust of these two brilliant dancers as he had been sitting for a long time and then in such a short walk is expected to be fully charged to support her.  So me describing their first lift as cautious is such a tribute to the respect and delicate situation they portrayed.  

Amy Harris and Andrew Killian were exquisite in their pas de deux.  Yes slightly off balance and needed some correction - but this was team work.  Some of the lifts are taxing.  When Amy Harris threw herself into Andrew Killian 's arms - the audience drew audible gasps.  The lack of applause was because the audience were internally beating their hearts in recognition of such incredible trust and beauty.  I know my heart was pounding with admiration and I have tears in my eyes now as I remember this moment.

The picnic scene was danced beautifully by Christopher Rodgers-Wilson, Jake Mangakahia, Dana Stephenson and Valerie Terschechenko who differentiated the class structure to the two passing peasants. 

The change-over from Clara, the Elder to Clara the Ballerina, in the bed upstairs, was not as neat as other performance.  A small quibble, but I relished it as every other performance was seamless.  I must confess that I wanted to see how they did the change-over.  I knew it would be a simple stage trick but I had been imagining a secret compartment or a spring loaded bed (all in keeping with the magic of the Nutcracker's theme).  So, I must admit I was very grateful for this revelation of magic. In doing so, my heart leapt with joy at the simplicity of the design.

The orchestra led by Simon Threw received thunderous applause for their brilliant performance.  The most magical moment is the transition from the overture playing on the radio to the orchestra joining in.  This is an absolutely priceless segue that highlights the magic yet to come.

I hope one day The Australian Ballet would do an entire season of Graeme Murphy's works, including "Swan Lake", "Tivoli", "Beyond Twelve" and of course "Nutcracker - The Story of Clara".

I gave this performance of "Nutcracker - The Story of Clara" a 7.5/10.

Wednesday, 31 May 2017

Wild Bore, Beckett Theatre at Malthouse Theatre, Wednesday May 31st 2017

"Wild Bore", Beckett Theatre at Malthouse Theatre, Wednesday May 31st 2017


"Wild Bore" was presented at the Beckett Theatre, Malthouse Theatre on Wednesday May 31st 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Wild Bore" had a warning that it will offend.  Sorry the most offensive part of the show was the woman in front who turned on her mobile to start texting about forty minutes into the show.  She nearly jumped out of her skin when I told her to turn it off!

"Wild Bore" was very funny at times and could do with some fat trimming of the script to tighten the product.

I loved the set within a set within a set concept.  Many late comers would have missed the opening with the stage manager preparing the drape around the trestle table and therefore showing us the empty space underneath.  This was the traditional magician's set up for a routine.

The opening sequence with the bums talking to us was fun.  The drinking of the bottle of water through the anus drew sniggers and shrieks.  The funnier part was when the actress later drank from the same water bottle and her colleague also drank from it.  I loved the second actress picking hairs from her mouth - a subtle joke that barely drew a reaction.

"Wild Bore" was a meditative philosophical indulgence that was worth seeing.  The three actresses had the audience thinking.

"Wild Bore" was not as confronting as other shows that I have seen, but in this age of political correctness it was refreshing to be taken back to the 1970's at times.

"Wild Bore" deserves to tour to showcase the odd ball humour and it will create controversy in some countries.

"Wild Bore" could do service to theatre goers to ensure that all phones are off.  Maybe they could include something about respect and why some people do not go to the theatre any more due to the rudeness of people on phones, texting, scrolling and even sometimes talking.

"Wild Bore" is a kink version of theatre catering for a variety of patrons.

I gave this production a 6.5/10 and my partner gave it a 5/10..

Additional notes:  I could not resist the following observations:

"Wild Bore" is a three ring circus of speaking "pussies" rear ended.  This is note worthy as the Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey Circus played their final show on May 21st 2017, so now we have to contend with the new animal acts - pussy.  (Note pussy in both a Australian and American context!) Do not go if you are easily offended and be one of the "Three blind mice"!

"Wild Bore" is the "Ring Cycle" of bum and poo jokes that a deep theatrical philosophical colonoscopy providing food for thought.  The messages and provocations have honourable intentions for the future of the human race.

"Wild Bore" is a "Ring Cycle" of Abba's "Ring Ring" with the rudeness of patrons on their phones!


Sunday, 23 April 2017

I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change, Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday April 22nd 2017

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change", Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, Saturday April 22nd 2017

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change", with book and lyrics by Joe Dipietro and music by Jimmy Roberts was presented by the Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, Chapel Off Chapel, on Saturday April 22nd 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

Immediately arriving home I wrote the following paragraph onto my Facebook page:

"The Griffith University/Queensland Conservatorium production of "I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change" played a short three night season at Chapel Off Chapel.  They are going to play in Sydney at the Lend Lease Darling Quarter Theatre 1-25 Harbour St Sydney from April 27-29th 2017.  They did a fine job, with what is usually played as a four-hander, with a cast of 27.  The harmony singing was terrific and there were some very talented young performers. They changed some of the songs for a larger ensemble that gives more depth to the music.   Some of the comedy timing works better than other scenes.  They played the poignant scenes with honesty. I laughed a lot tonight and thoroughly enjoyed the show."

"I Love You, You're Perfect, Now Change" was presented by Griffith University Queensland Conservatorium, at  Chapel Off Chapel for a short three day season and we saw it on Saturday April 22nd 2017

Some scenes worked better than others, though the singing was generally very good.  The diction with singing was clearer than some of the speaking.  There were rich harmonies and this is where the cast shone with the large ensemble numbers.

Yes, some segues between scenes could do with tightening up.  But, hey this is a student production of the highest quality.

Acting wise some of the cast maintained their character with more conviction than others.  The best actors were those who clearly defined their character, even when a background player.  It was terrific to see the roles shared among the whole cast.  I now prefer this version with a larger cast as it showed us more versions of regular people in these situations, and struck a nerve-of-recognition by the audience's laughter and engagement.

The small orchestra of five played the score well and were not distracting as they were upstage centre during the entire show.  Three of the orchestra were in the main cast and showed their versatility for future employers.

This musical was well cast with the student cast as they played a variety of roles and ages.  This young cast brought Joe Dipietro's book and lyrics, and  Jimmy Roberts' music to life.  No wonder this show ran for nearly twelve years Off-Broadway with such a tight book and such hummable tunes.

Lighting Design by Tom Dodds was basic and adequate.  The simplicity of the design was its success with no flashy tricks, but rather designs that kept our focus on the required action.

The programme clearly outlined the musical numbers and scenes with the corresponding cast list that aids in my memory of the show.  I hope that more production companies follow their example.

Chapel Off Chapel has renovated the bar and toilets that gives the venue a much more appealing supporting role.

During Act Two, there was a mobile phone incident that the entire theatre could see.  In the second row aisle seat, a woman just had to check her messages during a song.  She held her phone up high enough so that the back row could not miss her rudeness.  It was so distracting as the front row seats were vacant for any late comers.  Her prominent holding of her phone so high even took the cast aback by her rudeness.

The opening set the scene for what we were to expect.

I do not remember "We Had It All" in the 1999 version that I saw at the Athenaeum Theatre.  The "Not tonight I'm busy" scene was played well by Zoe Harlen and Oliver Lacey as they replayed variations of the scene over time.  They set the mood and the standards for many of the scenes to follow.

"A Stud and a Babe" showed us how both Jessica Mahony and Grady Swithenbank can transition between nerdy characters to more confident characters.  His costume was decidedly gaudy in keeping with the lyrics of the song.

The men sung "Why? Cause I'm a Guy" with gusto and verve.  They showed their commitment to the choreography with their defined characters' poses and mannerisms.  The ladies had masking concerns due to the small stage.

"Tear Jerk" showed us the change in Casey Martin's character with humour while he watched an unwanted "chick flick" as Shubshri Kandiah graciously and steadfastly held her characterisation.  The ensemble on stage left was in semi darkness with a simple and effective lighting plot by Tom Dodds, reminiscent of the cinema scene from "Equus".

"The Lasagna Incident" was well staged with Jordan Malone restraining her sexual tension, while we questioned Philip Jones' character's sexual preference or his virginal naivety.

"And Now the Parents" was one of the funniest scenes due to the defined characterisations of the parents ably played by Olivia Fisher and Josh Whitten.  The choreography by Helena Moore was crisp and clean with six framed observers seated watching the antics as if a Greek chorus.  They reminded me of the paintings on the wall from Harry Potter's Hogwart's school halls observing the action.  Austin David Cornish and Georgia Spark played the prospective couple and allowed the parents to shine during "Hey There, Single Gal/Guy".  Some women in the seated ensemble were not as clean with their head movements as others.  The crispness and sharpness added to the humour, especially with the more expressive faces.

"Satisfaction Guaranteed" was a funny scene especially with the entrance of the two men wearing lampshades on their heads.  With no wing space they entered via the tunnel on the audience left. It would have been funnier with a cleaner entrance from the wings of a theatre, and these young performers navigated the space with some hesitation, but I admired their determination.  Of all scenes, this looked like a drama school exercise.

"He Called Me" was a terrific scene especially for the journey of Shelise Vandal's character.  She showed us how we can get caught in unwanted phone-calls with honesty, and juxtaposed this with the change in her surprise in the second phone-call.  The choreography could have been executed a bit more accurately with the use of the pizza boxes.

"Scared Straight" was my favourite scene with the exactitude of intention from all four main players.  The entrance of Elliot Baker will not be quickly forgotten.  He has a rich tone to his voice and reminds me of Rowan Atkinson.   The young couple Sammy Sand and Jenna Dearness-Dark showed us how quickly they could be convinced to be united by the measured manipulation of Elliot Baker and Georgia Bolton.

The "Wedding Vows" scene was well staged for a large cast on such a small stage.   Some of the supporting cast defined and maintained their character more clearly than others.  The kiss sealed the end of Act One.

Act Two began cleanly with the end of Act One kiss.  This was where the basic lighting was at its best showing the couple in silhouette to begin the act.

Act Two shows the various characters aging with children, sexual deprivation, relationship complacency and funerals.  The characters age well and are well cast.

"Always A Bridesmaid" was a song made in heaven for the statuesque Hannah Gwatkin.  She would make a wonderful Ado Annie from "Oklahoma".  The version of this song with two other females (Maddison McDonald and Zoe Harlan) and the lone male, Casey Martin was poignant and touching to reveal, that men too, can play second fiddle to a bride or groom.  The harmonies were rich and emphasised the pathos of the scene.  Here the costumes worked well to highlight the ridiculous amounts spent on weddings.

"Whatever Happened to Baby's Parents" and "The Baby Song", could have been hammed up, but not so, as this scene, was in the capable hands of this fine trio.  They drew blood with the laughs they received from an audience who cringed in recognising common behaviours in this scene.  Joshua Moore's humiliation of baby talk was haunting.  The simple props aided the scene.

The "Waiting"  sequence and the "Waiting Trio" song was better than the four characters version. The 32 seconds of the football game drew lots of laughs of recognition from the audience, as Georgia Bolton was not to be disturbed by Shrubshri Kandiah.  The queuing for the ladies toilets was visually more realistic and desperate with five ladies. Manda Flannery had us convinced that she needed to pee.  Josh Whitten was brilliant in his shopping porter sequence and the audience roared laughter with recognition at his character's plight.  He is a real talent to watch and would be terrific as Nicely Nicely Johnson from "Guys and Dolls".  This sequence reminded me of the split-action during Sydney Theatre Company's version of "Falsettos".

"The Family That Drives Together" and the song "On the Highway of Love" was my favourite scene for the clarity of defined characters by all five performers. The timing of the comedy worked beautifully with the sly nuanced idiosyncrasies of each character.  Oliver Lacey as the dad who finally had control behind the wheel of his car revealed his macho ego, as the mother was played with requisite nervous tension by Courtney Monsma.  The baby with dummy was played by Olivia Fisher, which was a great piece of casting, as she surprised us by her sudden change in age as the mother from "And Now the Parents".  The two older sisters were played with conviction by Jessica Mahony and Jordan Malone.

"Shouldn't I Be Less in Love With You" highlighted the stillness of Meg Hamilton's aura as she quietly read the supplement from the newspaper, while her husband, Elliot Baker lamented his complacent love for her.  The scene was more poignant for her measured underplaying and comfort in her own surroundings.  Both played a middle aged couple with honesty.

"The Very First Dating Video of Rose Ritz" had Lauren Ware doing a sterling job in this self revelation that grows into a confessional scene of assurance and self satisfaction to be comfortable in her own skin.  This is a scene of resolve and the final lines are telling as she does not want to change a thing, which is in stark contrast to the title of this musical.

"Funerals Are for Dating" and "I Can Live With That" was poignantly played by Georgia Spark and Caleb Robinson-Cook who played the older couple with conviction and sincerity.  It is a very quiet and reflective sequence and brings the musical into clear focus of our humanity.

The finale, the "Epilogue" and "I Love You, You're Perfect Now Change" was stirring musically with the resounding and sensational harmonies of the ensemble.  The staging was brilliant to pair or group the performers as we were reminded of each character's journey.  I was glad for a reprise, but I wanted this whole sequence repeated.  I think by the audience's applause they wanted "Epilogue" and "I Love You, You're Perfect Now Change" completely repeated.

Sue Rider, the director should be very proud of this fine group of young performers.  Musical Director, Heidi Loveland should also be proud of the fine ensemble.

Overall, this production obtained an 8/10 from me, while my partner gave it an 8.5/10.


Monday, 17 April 2017

Lord of the Flies, Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017

Lord of the Flies, Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, State Theatre, Arts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017




"Lord of the Flies" from the novel by William Golding has been adapted by Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne, and was presented at the State TheatreArts Centre Melbourne, Saturday April 8th 2017

For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Lord of the Flies" is co-directed by Matthew Bourne and Scott Ambler, while  "Lord of the Flies" is choreographed by Scott Ambler, who uses a variety of styles of movement to encompass so many emotions and atmospheres. Scott Ambler has created iconic moments from the book and translated them to the stage with clarity and finesse.  His movement vocabulary expands from the archetypal to more specific.

The set and costumes are designed by Lez Brotherston who has succeeded on many fronts with the versatility of the available props and staging levels.  The set is a stage of a deserted theatre.  The boys begin in crisp school uniforms and gradually these change due to the circumstances.  The costumes on the racks should have been covered to be kept so clean, or, they should have been dusty to heighten the realism of a deserted theatre.  This took away an edge of the drama.

The transposition from an island to a disused theatre works and the set reminded me of the 2011 revival of "Follies".  This work would be so much more haunting in a venue similar to the old HSV Tele-theatre where "The Rocky Horror Show" played in Melbourne in 1975.

Scott Ambler's  choreography has succeeded on many fronts, beginning with the precision of the boys marching during their opening entrance.  The boys are in years and size order as they create a distinct school grading hierarchy.  They vary the formations to highlight their discipline and ability to follow instructions.    This is ominous as we readers know what is to come.  The subsequent formations and patterns highlight the passing down of traditions via a system within well drilled disciplined school.  What were the young boys to become in their formative years was shown by the older boys.  There is so much depth in the simplicity of the patterns: as we are watching their fate within this opening: to become like the older boys. All of the the young dancers were accurate and precise in their movements and would make the production team very proud indeed.

My heart leaped a beat of joy, as many of these young boys and men are having opportunities that will influence them for the rest of their lives.

Gradually the boys relax and become playful as they discover the insides of the derelict theatre.  This is where the choreography and staging becomes more complex.  Each boy has a distinct personality and they are responsible to tell their character's individual story.  The action is more staging rather than dance choreography and each boy has their moment to shine.  The staging is complex and integrates lots of small groups and duets and cameo solos to allow us to get to know the different characters.  Each boy has a unique way of moving for their character, some more defined than others.

There are some clever and theatrical uses of the 44 gallon drums to create cars and tanks that paid homage to the pedal car from "The Flintstones".  

A duet of gymnastic boys hung and swung on the poles supporting the main structure, with great precision and lovely lines.

A drumstick is discovered and replaces the conch from the novel.  The staging and choreography of the drumstick sequence is so clear emphasising the rules of listening to who holds the drumstick and the democratic process used by the school boys.

As the day becomes darker, mobile phones are taken out and used as torches to discover the theatre.  A search party is sent out to find food and water. This group goes into the audience.  They return with boxes of potato chips, sweets and water.  Wearing hoodies is reference to modern culture that challenges our traditional image of hooded youth from hoodlums to survivors or food saviours.

Simon (Patrick Weir) helps supervise setting up shelters and also is aware of protecting the younger and more vulnerable boys.  There is so much depth in these scenes that I cannot keep up with each of the characters.  I try to go with the flow.  I want to absorb so much of this production.

Gradually the boys turn to discovering, playing, and play-fighting until disorder eventually ensues. 

There is the famous pig hunting scene when the pig is beheaded and put onto a stake as a badge of honour.  There is short sequence that reminded me of Ravel's music and Maurice Bejart's ballet "Bolero".  This creates such a powerful image that is more disturbing due to their youth.  

The fire smoke signal scene is used to also keep the boys warm.

There is the power struggle between Ralph (Dominic North) and Jack (Daniel Wright) with a duet power struggle/fight sequence. Both men dance with conviction and unrelenting intensity.  Jack (Daniel Wright) develops from a confident strong man to a savage.

Piggy (Luke Murphy) assures Ralph (Dominic North) and supports him of his leadership role.  They join allegiance in fear of what Jack might become.  They use the clothes racks as shelter and protection and cover from Jack's gang.

Jack (Daniel Wright) breaks Piggy's glasses.  Piggy (Luke Murphy) goes searching for his glasses in a moving solo of pain and vulnerability.

A ghost or a stranger appears from the orchestra pit and I think this represented the corpse of the fighter pilot .    The young boy Percy (William Gilchrist) with his teddy bear sees the dead body and is frightened and seeks cover.

The dance becomes a ritual, that is tribal and primitive, and reminds me of the savages dances in old movies including "King Kong".

There is a menacing and maniacal chase scene of savagery, up and over and under the tiered set of scaffolding.  This chase is both dangerous due to the multi tiered set and the speed of the choreography.  The whole cast danced this sequence with requisite desperation and intent.

A young man on stage right unravels a tethered rope, and appears to lower a moon.  The various pigs dance a haunting pas de quatre in front of the moon to create striking silhouettes.   Simon (Patrick Weir) dances with four pig characters in a haunting nightmare.  Sadly, when pulling the rope back to raise the moon, the co-ordination alerted me that someone else must have been lowering and raising this large set piece in the wings. The entry of the moon entranced me by the magic of theatre, while the raising of the moon lost me by mistimed execution.

Some of the facial expressions and body language are priceless, while other expressions are forced and lacked a real connection to the emotional thread of the story.  The tender touch of Freddie (Joseph Wise-Nash) checking on another boy was magical and honest.  The shattering of the innocence of boyhood was played admirably Percy (William Gilchrist) with a clear arc of his character's story line.  His hiding under the step comforted by his teddy bear was priceless.

The roller door, upstage, opens and an armed soldier enters.  The boys are curious at his arrival, and gradually gain his confidence and leave - rescued from their ordeal.  Ralph (Dominic North)  sits at the front of the stage looking into the audience reflecting upon their collective experience and the future of mankind. This image is powerful as he could become the new theatre ghost.

Lighting design by Chris Davey enhances the various atmospheres to emphasise order, precision and discipline to the resulting fear, terror and savagery.  Chris Davey does so in many ways including dimming, focusing, spotlights, back-lighting and side lighting.  Lighting up the auditorium has a duel effect of the boy's exploring beyond the stage and more importantly exposes the audience members as potential victims or allies.  This effect makes many in the audience sit upright and take stock that they are also exposed.  This is a mirror to our world; as it could happen to anyone if you were in the boy's situation.

Music by Terry Davies builds from the military precision to foretelling doom to savage crescendos. Terry Davies' beat underscores many sections of the music to create a pulsating heart beat racing and trying to catch its breath.

There was not a weak performance in "Lord of the Flies",  and Matthew Bourne, Scott Ambler and  New Adventures & Re:Bourne should be proud of not only their theatrical work, but more importantly their work in developing these fine young men.

The calibre of the dancing was terrific and Matthew Bourne's New Adventures & Re:Bourne should be very happy.  The younger performers were watching their role models and were being mentored as to how men dance with masculinity and  strength.  These fine performers were so well rehearsed and showed that dance can display so many levels of emotional sensibilities and human responses.

I adore the story telling by Matthew BourneScott Ambler and company as they make story accessible and understandable while many other dance works lack his clarity and precision.

I am saddened as I would like to see this production of "Lord of the Flies" again due to the depth of complex staging and specific direction for each character.  At times, there was so much happening that I did not want to miss out on the growth (or demise) of each character.  Mind you, the audience focus was central in the direction when required to ensure we did not miss out on the key elements of the story.

The programme for "Lord of the Flies" was good value as there was only one half page of advertisements on the inner back cover that showed the sponsors and partners.  I wanted the programme to include a short synopsis of some of the key events or a summary of the adaptation of the book.

New Adventures & Re:Bourne is one of the most accessible dance companies in the world due to their rich collective of talent in this company.   Matthew Bourne is a genius to develop so much talent internationally and I long to see this company again soon.

I am very keen to see more works by New Adventures & Re:Bourne, in particular The Car Man, The Red Shoes, The Sleeping BeautyCinderella, Dorian Gray, Nutcracker, Play Without Words, Highland Fling and Early Adventures as I have seen Swan Lake and Edward Scissorhands.

Overall "Lord of the Flies" obtains an 8/10.  My partner gave it a 5/10 as it went on far too long for his liking.


Note:  (When researching the links for dancers and artistic staff, I found the 32 page Teacher Resource pack on the New Adventures & Re:Bourne website.  I did not change my review and will read the Teacher Resource Pack to enhance my experience.  This is what great theatre does - it lingers on.)

The five page synopsis in the New Adventures & Re:Bourne website is brilliant and I wish this had been included into the programme.