Showing posts with label Gabriela Tylesova. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gabriela Tylesova. Show all posts

Monday, 29 April 2019

Muriel's Wedding The Musical, Global Creatures and STC, Her Majesty's Theatre, Thursday April 25th 2019

Muriel's Wedding The Musical, Global Creatures and STC, Her Majesty's Theatre, Thursday April 25th 2019

"Muriel's Wedding The Musical"  was presented by Global Creatures and Sydney Theatre Company at  Her Majesty's Theatre, Melbourne on Thursday April 25th 2019.


For those new to my blog I write about the holistic experience of attending the theatre. I buy my own tickets. So if you want a re-telling of the story please refer to the links for further information or for further insights.  Note, that I may provide different links for repeated main words or phrases.  I write for my memories of what I have seen, and is more of a stream of consciousness.

"Muriel's Wedding The Musical" is based on the iconic movie "Muriel's Wedding" which has an emotional depth to the humour and the story.  The emotional depth and humour was sadly lacking in this production.  

Why?

I will outline the good things before I discuss what I did not like about the show.

Do not get me wrong, I liked the show, but we, as an audience should have been loved it and singing as we left the theatre.  We bumped into friends before the show began.  At interval, they said they could have left.  At the end of the show we left with our friends, and noticed no audience member was raving or singing any of the songs. To say the least we were all disappointed and we see a lot of theatre!

What I liked:

Updating the story of the film by P.J. Hogan to include references to social media, and the use of modern technology with smart phones, Facebook and Twitter and Instagram was a smart move to ensure modern day relevance.

Updating Muriels' job in the video store in Sydney to a photographic booth with life-size celebrity cut-outs was fun; as some of the younger audience members would not know what a video store was, let alone a VHS or Beta tape!  So this became a double joke for the older generation.  Mind you, no one laughed out loud at this change of location.

I loved the use of ABBA as Muriel's inner voice.

Music and Lyrics by Kate Miller-Heidke and Keir Nuttal were good with reservations.  My favourite song was when Joanie, Perry and Malcolm sat on the couch with the monosyllabic grunts and reactions.  I loved the integration of ABBA's lyrics and tunes into other songs, that I found to flow better than in "Mamma Mia" where they were contrived and opportunistic. Here,  Kate Miller-Heidke and Keir Nuttal maximised the opportunities to get inside Muriel's thoughts without prostituting the songs.  This was done with homage and respect to ABBA.  See below for why I did not like this production element.


Costume Designs and Projection Design by Gabriela Tylesova.  In particular the "Sydney" costumes were fun.  The bridal outfits were beautiful.  Muriel's daggy costumes highlighted and differentiated the status anxiety of her school group.  The ABBA costumes were terrific in capturing the mid 1970's spirit.

Set Design also by Gabriela Tylesova had some elements that I loved and others that I liked. The best part was the proscenium arch that was decorated with mobile phones and leaves.   The mobile phones would display different themes for some scenes, including menus, selfie photos etc. 

The set comprised of many sliding walls and fly in curtains to create different locations.  This scenic design idea has been used numerous times.  I liked the idea of much of the set, but the execution left a lot to be desired.

The set also include two revolves centre stage, and there were two tracks running from upstage to downstage.

Some of the Choreography by Andrew Hallsworth worked better than other sections.  In particular, I loved the bridal mannequins moving in a music-box-dancer style, juxtaposed by the more natural dance moves of the other characters.  I loved the gestural dance of the evil girls swiping their smart phones and flicking their hair back, as they paid homage to "Kath and Kim".  


The acting displayed adequate characterisations of each role without capturing the heart and essence and soul.  Yes, the actors created iconic moments from the film and created larger than life characters; but the performances were wooden and pedestrian to say the least. 

Emotionally, Pippa Grandison as Muriel's mother, Betty Heslop stole the show for me. Her first solo was cut short by others to emphasise her status in the family unit.  This was the first emotional high for me in act one. In act two, her death scene talking to ABBA was the only magical moment in the show.  The way the scene was staged could have been a drug-trip, and paid homage to suicide victims' plight.  It was if Betty was going to heaven.

Jarrod Griffiths as Brice Nobes, the parking inspector captured the essence of Muriel's plight.  He did not upstage Muriel; he just gave a solid performance with more heart.  Sadly, though I think his role needs to be trimmed as his journey overshadows the main plot of Muriel's story.

Muriel's father, Bill Heslop played by David James with the right amount of gruffness.  When he arrived home and entered through a door that was later used for Muriel's exit to her bedroom belied credibility.  In hindsight, Muriels' exit highlighted that the staging gave the scene a creepy feel as if Muriel's father had just entered the scene from her bedroom!  I appreciate artistic license of using sets for multiple uses and locations, but I did not like this staging at all.  No door would have been better had he entered one way, and Muriel exited the other.  Or use two doors.  Simple! 


What I did not like"

It was not as much fun as the movie!

Programme design needs to include locations of scenes as in many Playbill programmes.  I found it disrespectful to the lead actors that they were relegated to the back of the programme.

The opening announcement could have been so much more theatrical to create a wonderful sense of occasion and anticipation.  Creating atmosphere and acknowledging the rules of attending the theatre was done so well by David Atkins' production of "Hairspray" with their opening announcement..  Sadly, the producers did not use this moment to set the sense of occasion.  Maybe they could have introduced with "Don't be "You're Terrible Muriel" and spoil the show for others.  Turn off, that means off your phones"!

Below us, sitting in the stalls, mobile phones were being used to text during the opening number with not an usher in sight.  I mean these women were holding up their phones texting for half of the opening number.  The light shone in our eyes so badly we could not see the stage properly.  Plus the distraction meant it put me in not a good head space.  I do not pay $155.00 per ticket to be distracted by such Bogans.  Don't worry, I complained at interval and the ushers were onto the perpetrators in the stalls area.

"Muriel's Wedding" is a magical film that transports you emotionally, and this did not happen with the musical.  The audience should have been laughing uproariously at one moment, and then in tears at other times.  Sadly, this was not to be.

Direction by Simon Phillips was reliable and adequate but missed so many emotional connections between the characters.   This show was not up to his slick production values as in "Dream Lover" or "Priscilla Queen of the Desert The Musical" as the staging was messy at times with poor co-ordination of the set, lighting and stage hands.

The show lacked pace and highlighted holes in the awkward pauses between set changes and scenes.  Segues were messy, and were not helped by the stark lighting.  No attempt at really transitioning occurred.  Our focus was drawn sometimes to areas on the stage by poor coordination of lighting and set changes.  We were distracted by extra and inappropriate action at times that drew our focus from the main thrust of some scenes.

Music and Lyrics by Kate Miller-Heidke and Keir Nuttal were ruined by the location of the orchestra and the sound quality.  The film is rich in sound, while here it sounded distant, retarded and cheap.  The orchestra sounded if it was a small band for the local school production, using professional musicians and with a limited budget.   Wrong!  If Global Creatures want to take this show further, it needs a richer and fuller Broadway sound to the orchestrations.

The songs were not presented in their best way.  The songs and music were grating as we, including our friends said because we could not understand the lyrics as the diction was so poor on many occasions.  The songs would have been better had we had better orchestrations and lyrics that we could understand.  Thankfully the cast were not out of tune.

Sound Design by Michael Waters needs a lot of work with balance and execution of the coordination of turning on-and-off the microphones.  The clunkiness and sound quality was jarring.

The orchestra sounds tinny, thin and amateurish.  Orchestrations by Isaac Hayward need developing for a richer sound.  This is unforgivable when you are paying $155.00 per ticket.

Set Designs by Gabriela Tylesova were executed by stage technicians that were too clunky at times and disrupted the flow.  The screens and fly-in-curtains sometimes did not coordinate well. Some of the screens that slid in from the wings did not appear wide enough for Her Majesty's Theatre as they revealed entrances and exits in corners of the stage that took away the magic of theatre.

Set Design also by Gabriela Tylesova had some elements that I loved, and others that I liked.  In particular the proscenium arch was decorated with mobile phones and leaves.  The mobile phones would display different themes for some scenes.  I liked the idea of much of the set, but the execution by stage hands and technicians left a lot to be desired with clunky and jerky scene changes.  Exposed areas were revealed to show holes in the set design, and thus diminished what should have been magical theatre.  The stage crew should have been wearing blacks or other attire so as not to stand out as they tried to sneak and hide as they moved sets on and off the stage.  It was very tired and amateurish stage management.

Did I say - the magic was lost?

Lighting Design by Trent Suidest did not maximise the differences in location when the stage was split with two locations.    When ABBA appeared there should have been a private lighting change to emphasise we were entering Muriel's head.  The lighting seemed to be either on or off!

Choreography by Andrew Hallsworth does not highlight each character's quality as in other shows he has choreographed.  The group formations are safe, and have a good ballet school production quality, rather than slick Broadway style choreography.

The Act One scene in the Chinese Restaurant needs refining.  It became messy with ballet school like choreography and staging.  Though, the best aspect was the set as it brought back memories of the Chinese Restaurant and "Small World" scene from "Gypsy".

The reveal and entrances of Deidre Chambers played by Chelsea Plumley lost any surprise element.   She stood upstage centre, posing with her back to the audience.  There was no attempt at disguising her entrance, so the fun was lost.  It was too staged, and had an amateurish quality for her showgirl entrances.  Mind you, Chelsea Plumley had the best voice in the show!  She is too pretty and not haggard enough as she does not have the requisite wrinkles and face cream for the role.

The swimming sequence went on way too long.  Yes, double the length of time that the audience could tolerate.  Cull please.

Jarrod Griffiths as Brice Nobes, the parking inspector, sadly, though I think his role needs to be trimmed as the show is too long.  We could have done without the ten minutes of the "Never Stick Your Neck Out". 

Muriel Heslop played by Natalie Abbott was adequate but did not capture my heart.  Yes, she did the right moves and said the right lines, but lacked charisma.

When Rhonda Epinstall played by Stefanie Jones dropped her lighter, the average smoker would rescue their vital possession quickly.  She made no attempt to pick it up and could have done so and kept the dialogue happening naturally.  The more she ignored it, the more palpable the lighter on the stage became.  It was retrieved by a gentlemen and placed on the table later as he slid it under his left hand and then across with his right to where it should have been located.  Wow, this meant more to us than what else was happening.  This was an example of our audience focus being pulled away from the main action. Go with the flow and that is why actors study improvisation.  This highlighted that these performers were not in the moment, and gave pedestrian performances.

The following scenes could be reduced in length and tightened:  Life Is A Competition and S.O.S numbers, and the wedding-dress-store scenes.

The language could have been curtailed and use of "Fuck" once to emphasise the moment.  The other times made it feel like "I would have preferred to watch the dvd again".

The bows at the end were very ho-hum and the reprise of "Sydney" was appropriate, but the audience wanted an ABBA song to sing as they left the theatre!  The audience felt cheated as no one was singing as they left the theatre.  It is a musical, AND they should have been at least humming a song from the show! It was just too long!  Way, way too long.  The audience were exhausted after nearly three hours.  It became a chore, and audience members could at least tick off another "bucket-list" show to see. 

Now remember: the audience barely laughed at this performance.

"Muriel's Wedding" the movie is one hour and forty six minutes long.  It snaps along, while the musical just dragged on for nearly three hours.

Snap and slick will keep the show moving, as it dragged in both acts.

Revise, cull and shorten.  The script and production numbers need pruning.   Ensure the audience is begging for more!

Broadway:

"Muriel's Wedding The Musical" would be ideally suited to The Palace Theater on Broadway (where "Priscilla Queen of the Desert The Musical" played) but needs some work if it is to proceed to Broadway.

A friend, who attended the same performance, summed up the show and said "You're awful, "Muriel's Wedding The Musical"".

The show lacked the warmth of the film, and was a cold rendition lacking the emotional heart of Muriel.

"Muriel's Wedding The Musical" obtained a 7/10 while my partner gave it a 6/10.



Thursday, 24 September 2015

Sleeping Beauty, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Wednesday September 16th 2015

Sleeping Beauty, Australian Ballet, State Theatre, Wednesday September 16th 2015

The Australian Ballet's new production of "The Sleeping Beauty" is conceived by Artistic Director, David McAllister with Costume and Set Design by Gabriela Tylesova and Lighting Design by Jon Buswell.

I am usually not a fan of "The Sleeping Beauty" as in the past it has laboured on and on with audiences nodding off and lots of shuffling feet.  Previous productions have appeared either tired or just way too long.  I was surprised that a new production was so close on the heels of the 2005 production by Stanton Welch.

In the Weekend Australian Sharon Verghis interviewed David McAllister (Weekend Australian Review August 29-30 2015, pages 6-8).  She wrote about  "Welch's 2005  production was strong on ideas but fundamentally flawed aesthetically" and apparently Stanton Welch himself thought the costumes were weird when he saw it a second time.

The 2005 marketing blurb by The Australian Ballet was extolling the then new Stanton Welch version while in a recent interview with Amanda Dunn in The Age (Spectrum August 29 2015, pages 8-10)  reading between the lines David McAllister was not happy with the 2005 production.  In The Age interview David McAllister said "My aim is that once you sit down and the curtain goes up you won't be able to tell what is new and what's old".  He also said in the interview to The Age that he wanted "to get a production to be a bit more user-friendly to audiences, families and so on".   Congratulations to David as to some extent his vision does apply.

I was waiting to see for myself, because as a subscriber I thought "why not just fix up what you were not happy with Stanton Welch's production?"  David McAllister has succeeded with this redeeming production and turning my dislike of this ballet to fond regard and respect.

Costume and Set Design by Gabriela Tylesova is superb.  The set design with the bones or antlers protecting the wings reminds me of the model theatres that we would build as children using fruit boxes and the toys from the cereal packets.  It created a magical fairy tale quality with the hint of darkness.

Lighting Design by Jon Buswell illuminates the dancers, sets and costumes in majestic harmony.

The staging of dancers carrying on tables and the baby's crib was awkward.  I understand they do not use  mechanical trucks to wheel these set items as they may ruin the specialised dance floor.  (Is it Tarkett?)

Some children in the audience were falling asleep during Act Two as it was a school night and very late for most. Many of the children around us were nestling into their parents as they tried to stay awake for Act Three.  I do not blame The Australian Ballet if they bring this new production back within two years.  Also it would be admirable if they created a book to record the process of creating this new ballet and showcasing the beautiful designs for the sets and costumes.

David McAllister's notebook is full of his ideas.  I am surprised that the documenting of the choreography has not been recorded in Benesh Notation with the expertise of Mark Kay.  The purity of David McAllister's vision of intended moves and timing is more accurate using this type of recording rather than video or digital film which only records an interpretation of a performance.
It is so important to record the details of movement and intention in their pure form without politics of different interpretations. (Refer Benesh Notator, Michele Braban's specialised articles.)

Act One had a Black Prince who stole this act for me.  The four princes danced well but the Black Prince was sensational.   He was brilliant with his powerfully strong and assured presence and his crisp neat technique.  He was a prince to drool over for his masculinity and brilliant dancing.

Act One has Carabosse (Lynette Wills) present Princess Aurora (Amber Scott) with a spindle, and then accidentally pricks her finger and collapses into a deep sleep.  The Lilac Fairy (Valerie Tereshchenko) casts a spell over the kingdom and sadly about four of  the dancers fell on a musical cue rather than when directed by the Lilac Fairy's spell.  This error also occurred during Act Two when about four dancers (of the court) awakened on musical cue rather than when directed by the Lilac Fairy's breaking spell.

Act Two has a strange moment when Prince Desire (Ty King-Wall) does not see the Lilac Fairy each time she enters. This looks ridiculous and is the main part that needs some re-staging.  She is right in front of him and he pretends to not see her.  But then she is right in front of him again and he suddenly sees her.  It was corny and sillier than ever and had a disconnect with David McAllister's other visions for improving this ballet.   Cleaning this section up will create a more logical sighting of the Lilac Fairy by Prince Desire.

The other aspect that does not make sense is when Prince Desire is given a key.  As an audience we think the key is to open the large black gate in front of him, No!  The black gate flat flies out as we enter to see Sleeping Beauty in a casket.  He uses the key to open the casket.  (It is a fairy tale and logic does not always apply.)  In Act One there was more ostentatious miming for such smaller incidental actions compared to no miming by Prince Desire to open this huge black gate!

The ivory/bone coloured flats that bordered the proscenium arch were kept to frame Act Two.  When the black gate flew in these ivory/bone flats stood out so much that they looked out of place.  Maybe the lighting could subdue the focus on these to reduce the contrast as we are talking about a hundred year sleep here.

The sleeping chamber reminds me of the rose petals bed from the movie "American Beauty".

The story of the princes vying for Princess Aurora's affections in Act One reminds me that this story has been rehashed so many times.  The latest television versions of "The Bachelor" and "The Bachelorette" are poor cousins to this version of  "The Sleeping Beauty" ballet.

David McAllister's Act Three is the best I have ever seen.  The first time I saw "Aurora's Wedding" was in about 1967 at The Princess Theatre.  His version transported me to the magical wedding rather than wanting to flee the theatre from fatigue.

The third act was a major highlight visually and a reduction of audience fatigue.  Children were still falling asleep as it was a long night.   I am so grateful for the reduction in time.

During a large ensemble number with all of the dancers in rows. one male dancer in the front row wearing red shoes began another phrase of choreography and quickly recovered.  I am more in awe of the speed of recovery than the error.  Yes he may have possibly jumped forward in the choreography or started the choreography for another role.  Why you ask am I pointing this out?  Because this company is so good and dancing is a means of communication, and his partner's communication helped him recover from this hiccup.  Teamwork and trust work together are paramount.

Another couple barely had enough room to squeeze through during two line formations of one group moving downstage as the front row threaded back upstage.  Yes they banged into each and continued. No hysterical fits - they just got on with the job.  They cannot hold grudges as this could easily happen to anyone of the dancers.  It was only the second performance and confidence of spacing on the stage will improve.  Again I am more impressed with the resilience of this company and how the dancers just get on with the job.

Amber Scott is a sensational ballerina.  I found her left foot was being favoured a little during the first two acts.  If so, this is totally understandable as this is a huge role for any dancer let alone a ballerina of Amber Scott's quality.  By Act Three, Amber had overcome her tentative left foot, as her assurance returned thus demonstrating her supreme artistry.

I think her left foot may be aching due to the most magnificent pas de cheval en pointe sauté across on the diagonal.  I have seen other dancers perform a similar sequence before but not with Amber's lightness, grace and finesse.  Amber brushed her right foot with tenderness: caressing the floor while her left foot hopped along to create magic.

Ty King-Wall was brilliant as Prince Desire with his pure lines and solid technique.  His three double tour en l'air in a row were some of the cleanest and most majestic I have ever seen by a male dancer. He has a strong core and concluded each turn in a tight and clean fifth position without sticking his bum out at the end in his plie.  His arms were steel - strong, bold and regal, framing his body majestically.

Both Amber Scott and Ty King-Wall are ballet royalty.  Both dancers are for young dancers to aspire to, and for older people to relish in the fantasy they deliver.

The third act had the integration of the fairy tale characters at the masked ball.  These fairy tale characters were the friends in the woods from Act Two.  They arrived at the ball in fancy dress costumes.  This doubling up of the friends playing the fairy tale characters made sense for the first time ever in Act Three, rather than having the fairy tale characters just dancing party tricks.

The Bluebird pas de deux was good, though at times it looked like Brett Chynoweth's left foot was not fully stretched and this may have been an optical illusion due to the colour of the shoes. Or maybe an elastic broke as it seemed to flap a bit.   His batterie was robust.

Valerie Tereshenko was brilliant as The Lilac Fairy.  She has matured so much as an artist.

The various fairies danced well and I wanted more sharpness when required.

Act Two had the green nymphs protecting Princess Aurora from Prince Desire in various configurations.  At times this became corny when the protection was contrived and choreographed rather than really not allowing the Prince Desire access to Princess Aurora.  The configurations at times added more drama and we needed more of this.

John Truscott would have loved the ushers and bar staff wearing a pink flower in the lapel to add to the atmosphere of attending the ballet.  His vision for the Arts Centre Melbourne was that patrons should have an experience before, during and after a performance.

During the final curtain calls there was no Lynette Wills as Carabosse which was disappointing as the audience wanted to show her our appreciation.

Historical note:  This was the first time in three years that we did not have mobile phones or electronic devices beeping or flashing during the performance.  The Barbican Theatre also requests more specifically not to use flight mode or Silent but to completely switch off your phone.  I do long for the locating technology similar to what will be installed in the Barbican Theatre in London so the ushers can locate violators.

I have renewed faith in "The Sleeping Beauty"as a ballet after finally seeing a version that was beautifully danced, visually stunning and made sense.

Other observations:


My prediction is that Natasha Kusch will be promoted to Principal after her final performance in Sydney.  This will be a marketing coup for The Australian Ballet with the diversity of multi-cultures in the Principal ranks of the dancers..

The Australian Ballet should produce a book about the process of creating "The Sleeping Beauty" with lots of photos of rehearsals and designs.